Allowed

Jeevana Lakshmi v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Telangana HC10 Aug 2021WP/10328/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This advance order allowed a writ petition filed by Jeevana Lakshmi seeking a habeas corpus for her husband, Raghu Yerarlagadda, detained in Cherlapalli Prison. The court set aside the 2021 detention order and the consequential confirmation order, directing the respondents to release the detainee forthwith.

What did the court decide?

The impugned detention order No:08/PD-CELLI2021 dated 07.07.2021 and the confirmation G.O.Rt.No.674 dated 22.03.2021 were set aside; the detainee was directed to be set at liberty forthwith if no long

Jeevana Lakshmi Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 10328 OF 202'l

¶8

Between:

¶9

Jeevana Lakshmi, W/o. Raghu Yerarlagadda, Age. 40^years, Occ.^Household, Ri/o Flat.No.3508, B-Block, Lodha Meridian, Phase-5, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Cohmissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commrssionerate,^Hyderabad.

¶14

The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cherlapalli,^{Medchal-Malkajgiri District}

¶15

...RESPONOENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in^the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be pleased to} issue Writ order or direction more^particularly one in the nature of^{Writ of Habeas} Corpus under Article 226 of the constitution of^{lndia directingthe 3rd respondent to} produce Raghu Yararlagadda, S/o Y. Sai Babu who is now detained in Central Prison, Cherlapalli, before this Honble Court and he may be ordered to^{be released} forthwith after declaring his detention vide^proceedings No. 08/PD-CELL|CYB|21?1 , dt.O7lO1l2O21,^passed by the 2nd respondent which was confirmed^by the^1st respondent vide G.O.Rt.No.674 General Administration^{(SPL, (LAW} and ORDER)) Dept., dt. 2210312021 as illegal and unconstitutional.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D. PURNACHANDRA REDDY

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶19

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{A. RAJASHEKER REDDY} AND THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM^AKTHER

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.10328 OF 2O21.

¶22

ADVANCE ORDER:^(Per Hon'ble Dr.SA,J)

¶23

In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed. The impugned detention order vide No:08/PD-CELqCYB|202l,^dated 07.07,2021, passed by the respondent No,2 and^the consequential confirmation order vide G.O.Rt.No.674, General Administration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Department, dated 22.03.2021, passed by the Principal Secretary to Government, General Administration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Department, Government of Telangana, are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to set the detenu, namely, Raghu Yerarlagadda, S/o. Y. Sai Babu, at liberty forthwith, if he is no longer required in any other criminal case.

¶24

(Detailed order follows)

¶25

Sd/. N.^{CHANDRASEKHAR RAO} ASSISTANT^RE ISTRA

¶26

//TRUE^COPY// ICER SECTION

¶27

To,

¶28

i,i[:Eh:fi*ffi^{rl'r"{H:ilr"";?1ii,i,"#ff$s[";i$;}l#i'?,'s,tr.],,",} tfl![::$i'fii$][g:,,p,ai3,:'3'd"#ri',rl"'t35$%"hes'1a'1e'r

¶29

Two CD^CoPies 7. One^{SPare CoPY} CHR .,4rr

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010812021

ADVANCE ORDER

W.P.No.10328 ot 2021

H S
(,
C)
Lr 10 AUG202I
a
*

¶35

ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶36

Jeevana Lakshmi v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeevana Lakshmi v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Edla Sathi Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. P. Sujitha Vs The State of Telangana

K. Nagabhushanam and another Vs M/s. Via Rd 2 and 2 others

Smt. Sneha Singh Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Bukhari Kishen Rahul Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Amjad Vs The State of Telangana