In WP No. 10278 of 2021, the petitioner filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of fundamental rights and demolition of illegal constructions. During hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition. The court then dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDOY
WRI T PETITION NO: 10278 OF 2021
Between:
Smt. Nagma Fatima, w/o MdAshraf, Aged about 24 yearc, Occupation-Private Employee, R/o H No 12-10-587184C,Seetaphalmandi,Near PragathiSchool Seetaphalmandi, Secunderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto issue an appropriate writ, order ordirection more in the nature of lvlandamus, declaring the inaction ofrespondents moreparticularly that of respondents 3 and 4 in not initialing any action onmy written complaint dated 29.03.2021 against respondent No 5 who is making illegalconstructions in Plot with H. No'12-10-58718614, Seetaphalmandi, secunderabadin deviation to sanction plan vide Permit No. 3/C29l 07718 12019 dated16.05.2019without there being any permission obtainedfrom official respondents that too duringLockdownperiod, contrary to the Judgmentof Honorable supreme courtof lndia in civil Appeal No 33471/12 daled 29.o2.2012 as being as being lllegal,Arbitrary Un Constitutional, being violativeof Articles 21 and 3004, againsi the Letterand spirit of Catena of Judgmentsrendere_d by this Honorabi-e Court as well thatof Honorable Supreme Court of lndia apart from being violative ofprinciples of naturalJustice and Fair play, and consequently demolish the illegal structure raised.
lA NO: 1 oF 2021
Petition under Section'151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the Highcourt maybe pleased to _direct respondents 2lo 4lo ensureaction on respondent no 5 fromproceedingany further with illegal construction over andabove the Plot with H. No12-10-5871861A, Seetaphilmandi, Secunderabadin deviation to sanctionplan vide Permit No. 3lc2g;lo7t1Bl ZOlg dated16.05.2019 inpursuant tocomplaintdated 29.O3.2021against respondentNo 5, pendingthe disposal of presentwrit petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.M SEKHAR
Counset for the RespondentNo. 1: GP FoR MUNIcIPAL ADMINISTRATIoN& URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the RespondentNos. 2 to 4: SRl.CHATLA MADHU, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the RespondentNo. 5: NONEAPPEARED The Court made the following:ORDER
TI.IE HON'BLE SIII JUSI'ICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRI'I'I']ETITION No.10278 of 2021
ott I)EI{:
When thc ma tte r rs taken up, the lca rnecl counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ pe t ition.
I)ormission is accorcled
'|he writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
The miscellaneous petitions pencl ing, if any, shall stanci
cioscrl. fhere shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. T.TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY'
\L-
SECTION OFFICER
To,
DI,, *r;,.sz\
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910612021
m
,2 2 jtil{ 28fl
ffi
\ '' n-
ORDER
WP.No.10278 of 2021
Dismissing the WP As withdrawn Without costs.
.l$
,/'
@
Smt. Nagma Fatima
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Zonal Commissioner, Secunderabad Municipal Circle
Assistant City Planner
N. Jagadish
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
