Allowed

The State of Telangana v. Smt.Arikilla Rama

Telangana HC1 Feb 2021WA/289/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court in Writ Appeals 220, 289 and 290 of 2020 allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeals against a common order dated 07.01.2020 regarding W.P. Nos. 12915, 12549 and 12875 of 2019, reserving their right to seek a review pending filing of a condonation of delay application.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the Writ Appeals No. 220, 289 and 290 of 2020 with direction to file review and condonation of delay.

The State of Telangana Vs Smt.Arikill… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶5

WRIT APPEAL NOS: 220. 289 & 290 OF 2020

¶6

wA NO.220 0F 2020:

¶7

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^preferred against the order dated 07-01-2020 in l.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.'12915 of 2019 on the^file of^{the High Court.}

¶8

Between

¶9

The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary^{to Government,} I,4unicipal Administiation and Urban Development Department,^Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶10

T6e Mission Director, [Vission for Elimination of^{Poverlyin MunicipalArea} (It/EPwA), Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶11

ihe District Collector / Chairperson,^l\rlission for^{Eliminationof Povertyin} Municipal Area(MEPMA), Warangal Urban^Dislrict.

¶12

The lviunicipal Commissioner and Pro.ject Officer,^{Itilission for Elimination of} poverty in lVlunicipat Area(N/EPN/A), w"r"nsrl.uJNFL-?l.nl?Bln=rro*oENrs

¶13

1 ro 4

¶14

AND

¶15

1 Sri.Varikoti Nagaraju, S/o. Raja Lingam,^{Aged about 42 yea.rs,.Occ. Community} Orqanizer, IVEPIUA,^(Missionior Elimination^{of Povertyin Municipal Area),} R/o. H. No.2-9-124811 , Waddepally, Warangal^{Urban District}

¶16

2 The Town [t4ission co-ordinator, Mission^for Elimination:FB:?]ffi.t'fit1illp:fArea (IVEPIVA), Warangal Urban District.

¶17

J The Krupa Soiiety, Out-sourcing Agency,^{Warangal Urban District} ( Res pon d e nts 2 & 3 ar e n ot ne c e-sa r! o,ⁿ i""..^g}Sli 3 fr"r1r,,8lJ^po N D^E Nrs 5 & 6

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High courtmay be pleased to condonethe} delay of B days in filing the^{writ Appeal challengingthe order dated 07.01.2020in} l.A.No.1 of 2020 in WP.No 12915 of²⁰¹⁹

¶20

lA NO: 2 OF 2020

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High court may be pleasedto suspend the} operation of the impugned^{order dated07.0'1 .2020 in I A.No.1of 2019 in} WP.No.12915 of 2019,^{pending disposal of the Writ Appeal}

¶22

Counsel for the Appellants:^{ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL}

¶23

Counsel for Respondent No.^{1: SRI V. RAVICHANDRAN}

¶24

<..>

¶25

WA NO: 289 OF 2020

¶26

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against order dated 0710112020 passed in W.P No. 12549 of 2019 on the file of the High Court.

¶27

Between:

¶28

1 The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, IVunicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶29

2 Ilg_yjl:io!^{Director, fMission for Eliminationof poverty in lVunicipal} Area ( l\lEPIMA), Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶30

2 The District Collector / Chairferson,^-Mission for Elimination of poverty in It4unicipal Area(tVEPMA), Warangat Urban District.

¶31

4 The Municipal Commissioner and Project Officer, Mission for Elimination of Povertv in Municipal Area(NIEPMA)' waiangal Urban Plti?Bin...o^oENrs 1 ro 4

¶32

AND

¶33

1 . Smf Arikilla Rama, W/o.Stephen, Aged 42 years, Occ.Communitv Orqanizer. I{E_P.!A^{( Missionfor} Elimination^{of Poverty in trrtunicipatAreas),Ryo.H:Noi 512_} 205121A, Rangampet, Warangal Urban Disfrict.

¶34

2 rhe rown r,4ission co-ordinator, tr,tission?oE:E?I'.Tlf5iB:)35|T"'tntJl',:",J":-' Area (lr/EPMA), Warangal Urban District.

¶35

The Krupa Society, Out-sourcing Agency, Warangal Urban District.

¶36

(Respondents 2 and 3 are not necess', o'ni:iltlgigEll+BpESpoNDENrs

¶37

5 & 6

¶38

lA NO: 2 OF 2020

¶39

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order dated 07.01.2020 in wp.N0.12949 o,f 2019 pendino disposal of the Writ Appeal

¶40

Counsel for the Appellants: ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶41

Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI RAMESH CHILLA

¶42

WA NO: 290 OF 2020

¶43

writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 07 -01-2020 passed in writ petition No.1287s of 2019 on the file of the High court.

¶44

Between:

¶45

1 The state o.f relangana, represented by its principal secretary to Government, N4unicipal Administration and Urban Development Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶46

2 Ilg-ylgsiol^{Director, Missron for Elimination} of^poverty in lr,4unicipal Area (tVEP[/A) Government of Telanqana, Hvderabad.

¶47

3 The District collector / chairp'erson,^'[,4ission for Elimination of poverty in Ir,4 u n icipa I Area( IV E Plr/A). Wa ranga I Urba n District.

¶48

4 The Municipal commissroner aid project officer, l,4ission for Elimination of Poverty in Municipal Area(N/EPMA), waianoar u;N3;1_pltni?B)^."ro^,o.;r, ;;";

¶49

AND

¶50

Sandri Sunitha, W/o.l.Maheshwar Rao, aged 36 years, Occ. Community !rganizer.^{MEPl,4AllVtissionfor Eliminatjo-nof poverty in Vunicpjt Area'st} R/o. H. No.1 1-29l16/2, Desaipet, Warangal Urban Distiict.

¶51

2 9.gg:!t^{SujathaW/o,Ramesh,aged 36 years, Occ Community} Organizer, It4E^PMA(Mission for Elimination of povehy in lVlunicipat nreas), nl6.n.No.'a_Z_ 132. Gud ibandal, Hanamkonda, Warangal'Urban Disirict.

¶52

/--') -

¶53

G.Rama Devi, W/o.G.Srinivas, Aged 36 Years, Occ Community Organizer,lr/EPI/A(lVission for Elimination of Poverty in Municipal Areas), R/o H No 16-12-185/7/A,Labour Colony, Gorrakunta.'[S?Xts6S?!?ipf,,r,r.llE[;

¶54

4, The Town Mission Co-Ordinator, Mission for Elimination of Poverty in Municipal Area (lMEPl,4A), Warangal Urban District.

¶55

The Krupa Society, OuLsourcing Agency, Warangal Urban District.

¶56

(Respondents 4 and 5 are not necessury pu,li"Rltlgi8Elll8P.rroNDENrs s & 6 lA NO: 2 OF 2020

¶57

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^{suspend the} operation of the impugned order dated 07 -01-2O2O in WP NO.12875 of 2019,^pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.

¶58

Counsel for the Appellants: ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE^GENERAL

¶59

Counsel for Respondent No.1: SRI V. RAVICHANDRAN

¶60

Counsel for Respondent Nos.2&3: SRI RAMESH CHILLA

¶61

The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶62

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEr JUSTICE H KOHLI

¶63

AND

¶64

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYS EN REDDY

¶65

WRIT APPEAL Nos.220 ,289 and 290 of2020

¶66

C MMON DGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)

¶67

Leamed counsel for the appellants states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeals while reserving the right of the appellants to approach the learned Single Judge by filing the application seeking review of the common order dated 07.01.2020. 2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The review application to be filed by the appellants shall be accornpanied with an application tbr condonation ofdelay. Ifthe appellants file an application along with the review petition explaining the delay, the learned Single Judge will take into consideration the fact that the present appeals were preferred by the appellants against the impugned order in the year 2020 itself. The present appeals are disposed of along with the pending applications, if any.

¶68

SD/. A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA DEPPUTY REGIST R ,TRUE COPY'

¶69

SECTION OFFICER

¶70

To, 1. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the^{State of Telangana.} [OUT] 2. One CC to Sri V. Ravichandran, Advocate^(OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri Ramesh Chilla, Advocate^(OPUC) MBC 4. Two vCD Copies

¶71

HIGH COURT

¶72

DATED: 0110212021

¶73

$E ST4 it'
4
ay
io 12 FtB 2021 o1
-h
i_::

¶74

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶75

WRIT APPEAL NOS: 220,289^{& 290 OF 2020}

¶76

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEALS WITHOUT COSTS L <sup>0

The State of Telangana v. Smt.Arikilla Rama

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Telangana v. Smt.Arikilla Rama

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. M. v. Vijayalakshmi Vs M/s. Sree Kaleswari Travels and 3 others

M/s. Acer Motors Ltd. Vs P. Pratap Choudary

Korsa Singaramma Vs The State of Telangana

The State of Telangana Vs Sri.Varikoti Nagaraju

The State of Telangana and 3 others Vs Sandri Sunitha

Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited Vs Ajmeera Bheemudu