Dismissed

Mohammed Zulifikar Ali Siddique v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Dec 2021TRCRLP/13/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Transfer Criminal Petition under Section 407 CrPC seeking transfer of C.C.No. 663 of 2020, the Court recorded that the cause did not survive for adjudication and dismissed the petition as infructuous while also dismissing other pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Transfer Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications stand dismissed.

Mohammed Zulifikar Ali Siddique Vs The… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶5

TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mohammed Zulifikar Ali Siddique, S/o Mohammed Abbas Ali, Age. 28 years, Occ. Senior Manager - Business Development, Fl/o. H.No. 1-7-4317, Sri Sai Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal - 506001. Office Address. 819, Manjeera Majestic Commerclal Building, Near JNTU, Hyderabad - 500072

¶8

Ivlohammed Abbas Ali, S/o Mohammed Ali Saheb, Age. 59 years, Occ. Advocate, Rl/o. H.No. 1-7-4317, Sri Sai Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal - 506001.

¶9

Shameem Sulthana, W/o. Mohammed Abbas Ali, Age. 53^year, Occupation. Govt School Assistant, Fl/o. H.No. 1-7-4317, Sri Sai Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal - 506001

¶10

Mohd Haneefa, D/o . Mohammed Abbas Ali, W/o. Mohammed Ershad^{Ali, Age.} 31 years, Occ. Staff Assistant, F/O. H.No. 14-4-82, Nizampura, Warangal Urban - 506002

¶11

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court^{of Judicature} At Hyderabad.

¶14

Sheik Nazma, W/o Mohammed Zulifikar All Siddique Aged.^{36 years, Occ.} Private Sector Huzurnagar, Suryapet Dist. Office Address. Netcracker^technology solutions, Plot No - 5 and 43, Hitech Road, Cyber Gateway,^{Hitech City,} Hvderabad'

¶15

...REspoNDENTs/DEFAcro ..M'LATNANT

¶16

Petition under Section 407 of Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of^grounds of Criminal^{Petition, the High Court may be pleased} to Transfer the C.C.No. 663 of^{2020 on the file of Hon'ble JudicialFirstClass} Magistrate at Huzurnagar to Family Court,^{Kukatpallyor any other FamilyCourt in} Hyderabad as may deem fit

¶17

t.A. NO :2 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 407 of Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstances stated} in the Memorandum of grounds of Criminal^{Petition, the High Court may be pleased} to stay all further^proceedings in C.C.No.^{663 of 2020 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial} First Class Magistrate at Huzurnagar,^pending disposal^{of the above transfer Criminal} Petition

¶19

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of criminal Petition^{and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri RAMESH} cHlLLA, Advocate for the^{Petitioners andNone Appearedfor the RespondentNo.2} and Public Prosecutor on behalf^{of the RespondentNo.1.}

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HOI I'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶22

Tr Crl.P. No.13 ot 2021

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Learned c )unsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in ( the transfer crin inal petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has be :ome infructuous.

¶25

Recording the said submission, the Transfer Criminal Petition is dismissed as rfructuous.

¶26

Miscellane ous applications, if any pending in this petition, shall

¶27

stand dismissed

¶28

¶29

Sd/-I.NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII Go SECTION OFFICER

¶30

The J-udicial First llass Magistrate, at Huzurnaoar. 2. Two ccs to^pubri , prosecuior, High courtioiixJ'strt" of rerangana, Hyderabad (ouT)

¶31

a 9ne 99 !o^{Sri Ra neshChila,Advocate} (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies

¶32

A One Spare Copy Kj

HIGH COURT

DAJIED071'121202'l

ORDER

.: AE s €
t'
c e 7 D['12!p1
+
\l!. )-r

¶37

TRGRLP.No.13 of^202'

¶38

DISMISSING THE TR. )RL,P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶39

qA
4/

Mohammed Zulifikar Ali Siddique v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Zulifikar Ali Siddique v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nelluru Kapileshwar Vs Nelluru Ramyakrishna

M/s. Ram Reddy Constructions Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Ram Reddy Constructions Vs The State of Telangana

Vegulla Leela Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Vegulla Leela Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Bobba Sampath Kumar Vs The State Telangana