Dismissed

B.Govinda Raju, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Telangana HC2 Nov 2021TRCRLP/105/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice G. Sri Devi dismissed Transfer Criminal Petition No. 105 of 2016. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause did not survive further adjudication. The court held the matter infructuous and dismissed the petition, including ancillary applications.

What did the court decide?

Transfer criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications, if any, stood dismissed.

B.Govinda Raju, Hyd Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^{TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF^NOVEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

¶5

TRANSFER CRIM INAL PETITION NO:^{105 OF 2016}

¶6

Between:

¶7

B.Govinda Raju, S/o B.R.Dayanand,^{Age 42 yrs, Occ: Advocate & Business R/o} Flat No.5O4, Swathi Apartmeni,^{Bhagyanbgar colony' Kukatpally,Hyderabad}

¶8

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.}

¶11

Nethi Yadagiri,, S/o Pedda^{Laxmi Narsaiah, Aggi9O yrs,.Occ:Retired} Governeme-nt employee,^{r/o H.No.8-4-82, SatishNagar, Nalgonda town and} District.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Section^{407 cr Pc praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto} transfer the cc No.662/2011^{on the file of the Judicial First class Magistratecum} Special tVlobile court,^{Nalgonda District,state of Telagnanato any Magistratecourt} having^jurisdiction at Secunderabad,^{Telangana state'}

¶14

TRCRLP MP. NO:^{126OF 2016}

¶15

Petition under section^{407 (6) crPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition, the High courtmay be pleased to_ stay} all further^{proceedings in C.C.No.66212011from the file of Judicial First Class} nrrgiiirrt"^'cum Speliat^{MobileCourt, NalgondaDistrict pending disposalof the} Tra"nsfer criminal^{Petition and pass such other order or ordersas this Hon'ble court} may deem fit and^{properin the circumstancesof the case'}

¶16

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of criminal^{Petitionand upon hearing the arguments of Sri PRAVEEN} KUMAR VEERJALA ,Advocate^{for the Petitionerand the Public Prosecutoron} behalf of the Respondent^{No1. and of Sri A. KRUPADHAR REDDY,Advocate for the} Respondent No.2

¶17

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRl.PRAVEEN KUMARVEERJALA}

¶18

Counsel for the^{Respondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(TG)}

¶19

Counsel for the^{Respondents No.2: SRI'A KRUPADHAR REDDY}

¶20

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶21

THE IIONOURABLE^{JUSTICEG. SRI DEVI} TRANSFER CRIMIN^{AL PETITION No.105 of 2016}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Learned counsel^{for the petitioner wouldsubmit that the cause}

¶24

in this transf'er criminal^{petition does not survive turtherad-iudication}

¶25

and the matter^{has become infructuous.}

¶26

In that vierv of the matter,^{recordingthe said submission, the}

¶27

transfer criminal^{petitionis dismissed as infructuous.}

¶28

Miscellaneous applications, if^{any,, pendingshall stand}

¶29

disrnissed.

¶30

//TRUE COPY'

¶31

SD/"B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LL."

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

TheJudicial First Classagistrate cum Special Mobile Court, Nalgonda District, State of Telagnana.

¶35

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶36

One CC to SRl. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA Advocate tOpUCl

¶37

One CC to SRl. A KRUPADHAR REDDY Advocate tOpUCl

¶38

Two CD Copies

¶39

One Spare Copy

CDL

".--

TII

HIGH COURT

DATED:0211112021

ORDER

TRCRLP.No.105 of²⁰¹⁶

1i€ S l,r 1a
o+
1 E N0II20?I (-.
!,+
i
.3

¶48

DISMISSINC THE TR.CRL.P.

¶49

AS lNFRUCTUOUS.

¶50

B.Govinda Raju, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Govinda Raju, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balabommala Venkata Ramana Vs Paleti Nageswara Rao

Smt. M. Sweta Vs The State of Telangana

Vorsu Jagannadham Vs The State of Telangana

Maatha Venkateshwar Rao, Hyd Vs Gadapa Srihari, Adilabad Dist. and Another

Bonala Ramesh, Warangal Dt., Vs Alugoju Venkanna, Warangal Dt and Anr.

Yellapragada Maruthi Arvind and 2 Others Vs State of Telangana and Another