Allowed

Sravanthi Vankhare , Sravanthi Kotmirkar v. Vankhare Sandeep

Telangana HC27 Sept 2021TRCMP/95/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed Transfer C.M.P. No. 5 of 2021 transferring Hindu Marriage Act proceedings from Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal to Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, based on the wife's residence and Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

What did the court decide?

Transferred H M O P No. 15 of 2021 from Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal to Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad for trial and disposal.

Sravanthi Vankhare , Sravanthi Kotmirkar Vs Vankhare… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOF AT HYTTJREABITTE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶2

MONDAY, THE TWENTY S-EVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWo THoUSAND AND rwrrrrri oirE , ..,

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD TRANS. CtVtL M|SC.pETtTtON NO: 95 OF 2021

¶5

Between:

¶6

Sravanthi Vankhare @ Sravanthi Kotmirkar, W/o. Var r:arr,?::#r;:i:ff*,ylo[,qi:..J,Tililf ,tlt;t,*,r:i,ff, [{{:llhT

¶7

AND

¶8

...PET|TIONER

¶9

Vankhare Sandeep, S/o. Va ,X,mf i#":::[t:fu [ii]ji,I;ll8!;1fl^{:fl #,1il:i:f} ifi ;,?iB5;:i,p,..",,y

¶10

..,RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition under section 24 0t the c.p.c. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to withdraw the H M o P'No 15 ot 2021 pending on the file of the Hon,ble Senior civil Judge, Nirmal and transfer the same to the Hon'bre court of the senior civir Judge, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District to be tried and decide the matter.

¶12

IA NO: 10 F2021

¶13

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay ail further proceedings in H.M.o.p.No.15 0f 2021 pending on the fire of the Hon,bre senior civir Judge, Nirmar, pending disposar of the above Transfer c.M.p.

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri ch. Janardhan Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and of sri N. Manohar, Advocate for the Respondent.

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

The Hon'ble^Sri Justice^{T' Amarnath Gorrd} Ttansfe r C.M.P^{. No.} 5 of 2 021,

¶17

C)rder :

¶18

1 'fhis petirion is filed seekrng to transfer HMOP No^{15 of 2021 pendinu} on the file of^{the learned Senior civil} Judge,^{Nirmal to the file of the leatned} Scniol Cir.il Judge,^{Ntzamabad, Nizamabad Disuict}

¶19

2 Flearcl the^{learncclcour-rsel fot the petidoner/rvifc'}

¶20

3 Learned counsel for^{the resPondent/husbandhas oPposeddlis} l)ct1l^lo1l.

¶21

4 The learned counsel^{fot the petitioner/wifesubmit:tedthat Section19} ol the Hindu Marriage^{Act, 1955, has been amended irthe year 2003 bv} inserdon of provision^{(in) (a). Theamended Section19 (ui) (a) of the Act} gives special prefetence^{to the wife to file a petitionand p::osecutethe same} before the court^withinwhose iurisdiction^shetesides'

¶22

5 In vicrv c.r I thc ai;ove, the^{peudoner/rvifcdeset'"c:;the rciiel in t]-rc} instanr casc also silce she^{is rcsiding gith]n the} iutiscltct:on^{rlf Nizar-r)abatl} I)isrrict.

¶23

(r .\ccolclinsh, thts^'l r'(-\lP is^{rtlloNedantl ['l\l( )l) \o15 ol2021} 1-rcnding^{ofl thc ille r.)f the lcar:ncc1 Senior cir.il Judge,Nrmrai is transtcrrcclttr} the fiic of the lcatncd Scnior Civil Judgc,^{Nizamabad,NLz:Lmabad District fbr} trral anrl disposal in accorclance^{r.vith larv. I-Iorvcvcr, rhc uj.alCor-r::r is clircctecl} t<.r considel the letlttcst of the^{respor.rclent/hr-tsbanrl,ifanv, rnade fbt} dispensing u.itl-r hrs pcrsonal appearance.^{Nliscellanc rus pcritions, iftn1,} penclinq in thrs^'lr.CNIP shall stand closed.

¶24

SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal,^{AdilabadDistrict.}

¶29

The Senior Civil Judge,^Nizamabad.

¶30

One CC to Sri Ch. Janardhan^{Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri N. Manohar,^Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies 6. One Spare CopY sbr \

HIGH COURT

(

DATED: 2710912021

t aa ()
C':
1t?1,
:.)
0$
$$ A'
.zl.

¶35

ORDER

¶36

TRCMP.No.95 ot 2021

¶37

ALLOWING THE TR,C.M.P

¶38

@ \ u>5
\0 ><br>

Sravanthi Vankhare , Sravanthi Kotmirkar v. Vankhare Sandeep

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sravanthi Vankhare , Sravanthi Kotmirkar v. Vankhare Sandeep

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxminarayana Vs Kavarampeta Kashanna

Smt.Kavitha Devi Vs Smt. Gurajaalpramila and 9 Others

Shilpa Madhura Vs Bandige Ashok Kumar

Smt. Parshetty Sangamma , Sampoorna Vs Karney Srinivas and 6 Others

Pinki Majumder Vs Komma Ravi Varma

Dr.Nookal Vishnuvardhan Reddy Vs Mr.Udaya Prakash Rathi