Petitioner sought transfer of a civil proceeding and stay of proceedings under CPC sections 24 and 151. Court closed the transfer petition noting subsequent developments rendered adjudication unnecessary.
Transfer petition closed without costs; stay petition implicitly disposed with closure of main petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,N THE H'GH COURT FOR
nr xvo?fasaHEoF TELANGANA
i%'?BAI;.'f,il',fsI?p#",=
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM T NS. ctvtLMI c. PETlTro N 71 0F 20 6
Between:
f,?,;..il{'ffii,?i,,y,f ,,.?i33i:;1i,1:#,:1HH:Blx,3"ti,:,BJ jn",l,,.,:
AND
...Petitioner
ffihliffixiff :?J'&'Jrf,,.iRtl?ii3:,lHBI;:BIEhB^,a,i:.
...Respondent
Petition Under section 24 0f the c.p.c. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to transfer the o P No T5B of 2006 from the Famiry Judge court, city civir court, Hyderabad to any other court of competent within the jurisdiction of city civir courts, Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 1 0F 2016(T RCMPMP. NO: 1 20 0F 2016)
Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in o.P.No.7s8 of 2006 on the file of the Family Judge Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Transfer petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. SESHAGIRI RAO
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THEHON' BLE SRI JUSTICECHALLA KODANDA RAM Tr. c.M.P.No.87lof 16
OR D ER
Petitionerseekstransfer of O'P' No' 758 of 2006 from the FamilyCourt, City Civii Courts' Hyderabad to another competent Courtof civil jurisdictionin the said Courts'
Heard learnedcounsel for the petitioneras well as the respondent.
A perusal ofthe aflidavit {iled in supportof this Petition disclosesthat the petitioner lacks confidencein the then Presiding Officer onaccount of the observations said to have been madeat the hearing.The learned counsel for the respondent now submits that the saidOfficer was transferred'
In view of thesubsequent developments, as reported' nothing remains inthis Petitionto be adjudicated, hence, it is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneouspetitions,if any pending, shall stand closed'
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The Family Judge Court,City Civil Court, Hyderabad' 2. One CC to Sri J. SeshagiriRao,Advocate IOPUC] 2 One CC to Sri NandigamKrishna Rao,Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD Copies MMK gbr
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0210612021
ORDER
SIA
1
Oo I 4 I3?l
* .h
.l)r:'
TRCMP.No.871 of 2016
CLOSING THE Tr.C.M.p.
WITHOUT COSTS
L )Fry
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
