Respondent filed O.S.No.118 of 2012 in the Courl of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Armoor, against respondent alleging his interference with respect to suit plots bearing No,1 to 7,, 12 and 13 covered by Survey Nos.10 and 1l situated at Bheemgal Village ancl Mandal, Nizamabad District. lt is not in dispLrte that both the parties have claimed right in the suit schedule property through registered sale deeds. It is also not in dispute that the respective vendors of the parties had filed cases against each other on earlier occasion and they were ended in dismissal. The trial Court by recording a categorical finding that the suit schedule property, which is being claimed by the respondent/plaintiff, and the propefty that is being claimed by the appellant/defendant are different and the documentary evidence adduced proves that the respondent is in possession of the suit schedule property as on the date ol filing of the suit, decreed tl.re suit vide judgment dated 14.03,2018, aggrievecl by which, thc appellant frled A.S.No.37 of 2018 in the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nizamabad. The lower appellate Court concurred with the said judgment and thereby, dismissed
