Disposed

National Insurance Company Limited, Khammam and Another v. Nadipalli Gopika and 4 Others

Telangana HC17 Sept 2021MACMA/1559/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In MACMA No. 1559 of 2008, the High Court disposed of the appeal by referring the matter to Lok Adalat where a settlement was reached. The insurance company withdrew the appeal, and the MACMA was disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat Award dated 10.07.2021 without costs.

What did the court decide?

The appellant was permitted to withdraw the appeal; the MACMA was disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat Award dated 10.07.2021.

National Insurance Company Limited, Khammam and… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶5

M.A.C.M.A,NO .1559 0F 2008

¶6

Appeal filed Under Section 173 of M.V. Act against the Order and decree made in O.P.No.2026 of 2005 dated 03.09.2007 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- Principal District Judge, Warangal.

¶7

Between:

¶8

National lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Wyra Raod, Khammam.

¶9

National lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, JPN Road, Warangal

¶10

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3

¶11

AND

¶12

Nadipalli Gopika, W/o late Pattabirama Rao, aged about 30 years, Occ: House Wife,

¶13

Nadipalli Pranaya, D/o late Pattabirama Rao, aged about 10 years, Occ: Student,

¶14

Nadipalli Pravalika, D/o late Pattabirama Rao, aged about 8 years, Occ: Student, Res. 2and 3 are being minors rep. by their Natural mother i.e., Respondent No.1 )

¶15

Nadipalli Somalaxmi @ Somamma, aged 60 years, Occ: House Wife,

¶16

All are Rio Ravirala Village, Nellikudur Mandal, Warangal District.

¶17

Annapuram Ravi, S/o Somendri, aged major, Occ: Business R/o Peddavanagara Post, Kandakandal Village and lvlandal, Warangal District.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶19

MACMA.MP. NO: 3599 OF 2008

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the execution of the decree and^judgment dated 3-9-07 passed in OP.No.2026 of 2005 on the file of Chairman MACT -cum- District Judge, Warangal pending disposal of the appeal.

¶21

MACMA.MP. NO: 6896 OF 2008

¶22

Between:

¶23

Nadipalli Gopika, W/o late Pattabirama Rao, aged about 30 years, Occ: House Wife,

¶24

Nadipalli Pranaya, D/o late Pattabirama Rao, aged about^'10 years, Occ: Student,

¶25

Nadipalli Pravalika, D/o late Pattabirama Rao, aged about 8 years, Occ: Student,

¶26

Nadipalli Somalaxmi @ Somamma, aged 60^years, Occ:^HouseWife,

¶27

(Petitioners 2 and 3 are being minors rep. by next friend and Natural mother 1"t Respondent i.e., Nadipalli Gopika)

¶28

All are Fl/o Ravirala Village, Nellikudur Mandal, Warangal District.

¶29

,..PETITIONERS

¶30

AND

¶31

'1 . The National lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Wyra Raod, Khammam.

¶32

The National lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, JPN Road, Warangal

¶33

Annapuram Ravi, S/o Somendri, Fl/o Peddavanagara Post, Kandakandal Village, Warangal.

¶34

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in MACMAMP No.3599 of 2008 in MACMA No.1559 of 2008 Dated: 01-07-2008.

¶35

Counset for the Appellants: SRI RAMACHANDRAREDDY GADI

¶36

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI A. R.AVINDER

¶37

Counsel forthe Respondent No.s: NONE APPEARED

¶38

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶39

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶40

M.A.C.M .NO.1s59 0P 2008

¶41

JUDGMENT:

¶42

Heard both sides and perused the record.

¶43

Vide order dated 07.O7.2021, the MACMA was referred to Lok Adalat. On lO.O7 .2021 , the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat and an Award was passed by the Lok Adalat.

¶44

In view of the same, the MACMA is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 10.07.2021, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶45

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand

¶46

closed.

¶47

SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// '" L-" SECTION OFFICER

¶48

To,

¶49

The Chairman, I/ACT -cum-^{DistrictJudge, Warangal(with records)}

¶50

One CC to Sri Gadi Ramachandra^{Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶51

One CC to Sri A. Ravinder,^Advocate IOPUC]

¶52

Two CD Copies

¶53

One Spare Copy

¶54

(Along with a Copy of Lok Adalat Award)

gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1710912021

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.1559 of 2008

¶60

o!- 4('
tt(i
i) 21 ACT?l,lt
{.

¶61

DISPOSING OF THE MACMA WITHOUT COSTS

4^\o,

(

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶66

HELD AT HYDERABAD

¶67

lOrgonlzed^{by Hlgh} Court Legol Services Committee High Courl lor lhe Slole of Ielongono

¶68

(Through Video Conference mode)

¶69

Under Seclion l9 of lhe tegol Services Autho,ilies Act,^'l 987 (Cenkol Acl)l

¶70

MACMA No. 1559 of 2008

¶71

(Before the Hon'ble Hlgh Court)

¶72

(Against the order in o.P,No. 2026 of 2005 on the file of the chairman, Motor Accidents claims
Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Warangal)
Appellonls/Respondenl No.2 & I The No'iionol lnsuronce Co. Ltd.. Rep. by its
3 Bronch Monoger, Bronch Office ot Wyro
Rood, Khommom.
2 Notionol lnsuronce Co,Ltd., Rep.by its Bronch
Monoger, Bronch Office ot J.P.N.Rood,
Ill Worongol. I
Respondenls/Pelilioners/ l Nodipolli Gopiko, W/o.Lote Potiobiromo Roo
Respondenls oged oboui 30 yrs, Occ: House Wife.
2 Nodipolli Pronoy, D/o.Lote Pottobiromo Roo,
oged obout l0 yrs, Occ: Studeni
3 Nodipolli Provoliko, D/o.Lote Pottobiromo
Roo, oged obout 8 yrs, Occ: Student
Respondents 2 & 3 ore being minors rep.by
HIGH COURT
their Noturol mother i.e., reipondent No.l
LUA AUALAI
4. Nodipolli Somoloxmi @ Somommo, oged 60
yrs, Occ:House Wife.
All ore R/o.Rovirolo villoge, Nellikudur Mondol,
Worongol District.
5 Annopurom Rovi, S/o.Somendri, oged Moior,
Occ: Business, R/o.Peddovonogoro Post,
I Kondokondol villoge & Mondol, Worongol
Diskict.
[No. of proceedings of ihe High Court Legol Services Committee:
ORDER ROC.No737 lHCLSC1202l, Doted 07 -4-20211
:: Present ::

¶73

Nome of Choirmon

¶74

Nome of Members

¶75

: Hon'ble Sri Justice^{P.Noveen Roo,} Judge, High Court^{for the Stoleof Telongono'} : (1) Sri Chollori^{NogesworoRoo, Advocole'} High Courl for lhe^{Stote of Telongono} (2) Smt.P.S. Monjulo Kumor,^Advocote, High Court for^{the Stoleof Telongono'}

¶76

AWARD

¶77

The obove Cose between^{the porties hoving been referred for} determinotion to the^{LOK ADALATond the porties hoving compromised the} cose / motler,^{the following Awordis possedin terms of the setllemeni:}

¶78

l.ThisMACMAorisesoutoftheorderdoted03-09.2007possedin

¶79

o.P.No.2026of2005onthefileoftheChoirmon,MotorAccidents

¶80

t. Cloims Tribunol-cum-^DistJic i Judge,^Worong th,

¶81

¶82

tfr6tt

¶83

The Tribunol^{hos gronledcompensolionof Rs 5',l8'500/-(Rupees-} Five lokhs eighteen^{lhousondond five hundredonly) wiih interest @} 9%^{p.o. from the doie of the petition till the dote of reolizoiion'} Aggrieved^{by the order, the lnsuronceCompony hos preferred this} oppeol.

¶84

The Appellonts/Respondents^{No'3 & 4 -Noiionollnsuronce} Compony^{Limited,representedby Smt'sujotho K'Kumor'Monoger'} hos represented^{before the Lok Adolot lhrough online over the link} provided by lhe High^{Court Legol ServicesCommittee'High Court} for the Stote^{of Telongono'ln view of the lotest Judgmenlsof the} Hon'ble Supreme^{Court of lndio, NewDelhi'ond in consuttotion with} the victim,^{the Appellont/lnsuronceCompony intends to withdrow} the oppeol.^{Accordingly,the Appellontis permittedto wilhdrow'}

¶85

ln view of^{the oboverepreseniotionmode on beholfof the} Appellont/lnsuronce^{Compony, the oppeolstonds disposedos} withdrqwn.

¶86

The lnsuronce^{ComPonYisreody to dePosilthe remoining} decreelol omount^{wilh occrued inieresl ofier giving due creditto} the omount^{olreody deposiied, wilhin (90) doys from lhe dote of} receipi of copy of^{ihis oword.}

¶87

The^porties ore^{informedthot the courl fee, i' ony, poid by ony of} them sholl be refunded.

¶88

.tu
7 . No order os 1o the costs Co. Ltd
arr+-af
s n atPo fy
Appellonts/Respondent No.3 & 4/
lnsuronce Com n
QS--.'..-e*
Choirmon mber Member
SERv/i
c N-
o
Dote: 10.4.2021 OUFl
H IGH C
ot LOK AO AL A1 l
t
Se o -e o tlee)

National Insurance Company Limited, Khammam and Another v. Nadipalli Gopika and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

National Insurance Company Limited, Khammam and Another v. Nadipalli Gopika and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anish Kumar Dundoo Vs State of Telangana

Jatin Agarwal Vs T.Harshini

Dumpala Srikar Vs The State of Telangana

Master Firdose Vs the General Manager, Apsrtc.

The New Inaia Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt.Illutam Swaroopa and 5 Ors.

National Insurance Company Limited Vs Venkatamma and 3 Ors.