Appeal under Section 173 of M.V.Act, against the Order and decree madeⁱⁿ MVOP No.57 of 2015 dated 05/07/15 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum-Xll Additional Chief Judge, City^CivilCourt, Secunderabad.

¶10

Between:

¶11

The New lndia Assurance Company^{Ltd., Rep by its Branchlr,4anager(Claims HUB) 6th} Floor Surya Towers' sP Road' secunderabad

¶12

...AppELLANT/ RES''NDENT^No.2

¶13

AND

¶14

Smt Padala Lakshmi, Wio.Sri^{Padala lvlohan,aged about-3o yaers, Occ-} Housewife

¶15

Smt.Padala Anasuya, W/o.Sri^{VasudevRao,aged about-60 yaers, Occ-} Housewife (both are R/o.H.No.8-59, Sai Priya Colony Muthangi,^{Patancheru, Medak District-} 502 300)

¶16

Sri.Gen(ala Ram Krishna,^{S/o.Madanna, aged-Major,Occ-Business,} Rvo. H. No.2 1 -64, Kond a^peta Done, Kud

¶17

B5,;3,tft f#lf,of ,=r,r,o*=*,

¶18

For the Appellant : SRI T.RAMULU,^Advocate

¶19

Forthe Respondents : SRI AKKAM^{ESHWAR,Advocate}

¶20

The Court delivered the following:^JUDGMENT

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶22

AND

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI J[,S?ICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶24

MAC MA. No. 149 of 2018

¶25

JUDGMENT : (per Honble Sn Justlce M.S. Itamacbimrira l?aot

¶26

This appeai was referred to Lok Adalat held by the High Court Legal Services Committee and an Award has been passed by the said Committee on 20.O2.2021 as per the terms of the agreement entered into between the parties before it.

¶27

Therefore, this Appeal is disposed of in terms of the said Au,ard dt.20.02.2021.

¶28

3 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha-ll stand closed.

¶29

Sd/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// [,,-

¶30

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

The chairman, Motor Accidents craims Tribunar -cum- xil Additionar chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. 2. a 9n" 99^{to Sri T.Ramutu,Advocare} tOeUCy 9n" 99^{to Sri A,Eshwar. Advocare} iOeUCj 4. Two CD Copies (copy of the award dated 2OlO2l2O2j\ Kj

HIGH COURT

DATEDr07l0412021

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.149 of 2018

s 1t.E S 1,.1 i4
o
{
coJ 2 i APH 202t
t-.i/
.t ^a
cQ

¶39

DISPOSING THE MACMA.

¶40

{
t)q
,Xtt'

¶41

BEFORE THE i"OK ADALAT

¶42

HEtD AT H!'DERAEAD

¶43

J-<t*<<<<<<<L4

¶44

lOrgonized^{by :iigl) Couri iegol ServicesCommittee} High Court for lhe :ttole of Telongono (Throu gil Video Ccnference mode)

¶45

Under Section I 9 of the Legol Servicfls Authorilies Act, I ?87 (Centrol Acl)l MACMA No 149 of 2018

¶46

(Before the Hon ble High Court)

¶47

(Agloinst lhe Order in O.P.No. 57 ol 2015 or! tiit, file ot lhe Choirmon, Molor Accidents Clcints Trib(,nol.cum-Xll Additicnlrl Chief Juci?e, City Civil Court ot Secundercbod.)

¶48

II-np p ett.,*l n "Wo" O "" t - Z Tlre I'Jew lndio Assuronce Conrpr:ny Ltcl.,
Re!,., by iis Branch Monoger, (Cloims H!.jB),
6rr, :ioor, Suryo Towers, SP ROod,
SeL:r.lnderobod.
L----_
I'.espondenls/ Cloirn Petilioners L Sm i.Podolo Lokshrnl, W/o.Sri Podolo N4
o ,:d 30 yeors, Occ: Housewife.
I 2 Sn'i.Podolo Anosuyo, W/o.Sri Vosudev Roo,
i/
o og,rd oboui 60 yeors, Occ: Household,
I
I Bolh ore R/o.H.No.8-59, Soi Priyo Colony,
Mul'hongi, PotoncherJ,
IIIGH COiJI?T J Medok Diskict-SO2 300.
J S:i,Genkolo Romo Krishno. S/o.Modonno,
og.id Mojor, Occ: Business,

¶49

Rir.,.rl.No.2l-64, Kondopelo, Done, K,Jrnool . 'c' A^- ol^ro Prodesl.-503003

¶50

INo.^{cf proceedings t:f the High aou,i 1'--golServices Comrniitee:} ORDER liOC.No.l95/HCLSC/2C21, Dcle,r 30-01-20211

¶51

:: Present ::

¶52

Ngme oi'Choirmon

¶53

: Hon'bl.r, Sri Justice P.Noveen Roo.

¶54

Judge, liigh Court for lhe Slote of Telongono.

¶55

llome of Members : (I ) Sri Metlu Goverdhon Reddy, Advocote, iiigh Courl for the Stote of Telongono

¶56

(2) Srnf . P.Sujotho, Advocole, High Couri for the Slote of Telongono.

¶57

AWARD

¶58

The obove Cose between lhe porties hoving been referred^f or delerminoiion io the LOK ADALAT orrd ihe^porties hoving compromised^the, cose / molter, the fcllowing Aword is E,ossed in lerms of the setilement:

¶59

I. This MACMA orises out of the order dqted 05-07-2Q17 in OP.No.S7^r-)f 2015 on tl^.e file of the Chqirmqn,^MotorVehicle Accident Cloims Tribunol"cunr-Xll Addiiionol Chief Judge, Cily Civil Courts^qt Secunderobod.

¶60

The Tribunol hos gronled compensotion of Rs. 71,t6,410/-^(Rupees Seventy one lokhs ninety six thousond four hundred^{ond ten only)} wilh proportlonole cosls ond inieresl @ 9%^per onnum^{from the} dote of^pelition till the cicte of reolizoiion.^{Aggrieved by ihe order,} the Insurcnce Comoony hos^prefened lhis oppeol,^Duringthe pendoncv of oppeo both the poi'iies hove compromiseo^lhe n;loiter.

,5;r,il* \

The Respondents/Cloirh Petitioners No. I & 2 olong^.#ith th counsel Sri G.Udoy Kumor. Advocote, hove represented before lhe virtuol Lok Adolot by oltending in the office of Secrefory, High Ccurt Legol Services Committee. High Couri for the Slote of Telong,:no.

¶65

The Appellonl/Respondent No.2 - Nlew lndio Assuronce Compony Limited, represented by Sri R.Mohodevon, Regionol l'/onoger. hos represented before the virtr;ol Lok Adolot by ctlending in the office of Secretory, High Court Lc-:gcl Services Commillee, High Court tor lhe Stole of Telongono,

¶66

J. Bolh the porties sloted thot they resolved the dispule omicobly onC entered into compromise. Ihe Respon<jents/Cloim Petilioners No.l & 2 hqve produced co[)y of Aodhor Cords in proof of their identificotion. The moller hos been seilled omicobly between the porlies.

¶67

The Respondents/Cloim Pelilioners No. I & 2 ore reody to forego Rs.2?,7 1,410 l-,tne nppettoni/Respondent No.2/lnsuronce Compony

¶68

ogreed to sei'lle the motter for cn omount of Rs.42,25,000/- (Rr.rpees Forty two lokhs twenty five tirousoncl onlyJ wilh on interest @ 9% per onnum from the dote of petition till reclizotion. The Appellont/ Insuronce Compony/Respondent No.2 olreody deposiled 50% of the decreetol omounl ond now ogreed to deposit remoining bolonce omounl.

¶69

7, Accordingly, the oword is ;rossed for lhe obove soid omount of Rs.42,25,000/- {Rupees Forly two lokhs twenty five thousond only) with on interest @ 9% per onnum from the dole of petltion tili reo lizotion.

¶70

B. The Appellont/Respondent No.2/lnsuronce Compony hos to cleposit the soid omount of Rs.42,25,000/- (Rupees Forty two lokhs twenty five thousond only) vziih on interest @ 9% per onnum from the dote of petition till reolizoiicn wilhin o period of two (2) montfrs from the dote of receipt of copy of this oword ofter giving due credit to the omount olreody deposiled. ln the event of defoult or deloy in moking such deposit, lhe omounl poyqble sholl corry interest ot 12% per onnum from the dote of defoult.

¶71

Afler deposit of settled omount, the Respondents/petitioners No.l & 2 ore permitted lo wilhdrow lheir respective shores os opportioned by the Tribunol/Lower Court.

¶72

10.1n terms of the compromise ori.ived ol between the porties, lhls cose stonds disposed of. tP

I I

{ ..+r.._<.)

1 l.The porlies ore informed tho't ihe court fee' if qny' poid by ony of
ihem before lower couri sholl be ref unded
'I
a)
s
2 4,,.D
q) clu 9,"5 hso -3-.,
'"ffbffi,"T,ffi.ru,Lmd.
ResPondenls /Cloimonts
ellonl
tFaa prf+o;rl /ehaft
Duly Constituted Attorney
Counsel for Appellonl / Respondent
Counsel for ResPo ndents /Cloimonls
Member
em er
Choirmon
';
Da\e.2a.a2 2a2"
rl ] o 1
rlJ
,t'd
-fhd e)
S

the new india assurance v. smt Padala lakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

the new india assurance v. smt Padala lakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bushra Maheena Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Other

Vemula Hareesh Vs The State of Telangana

Dr.Yeswanth Adapa Vs State of Telangana

Sri. G.V. Gyaneshwar Naidu and 4 others Vs Smt Lalitha Srikrish and 13 others

K. Akhil Reddy Vs Smt. Lalitha Srikrish

M/s. Kores India limited Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner(Ct)