Dismissed

Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Telangana HC17 Mar 2021ITTA/439/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records the withdrawal of an Income Tax Tribunal appeal initiated by the appellant, allowing a future approach to the High Court if the Direct Taxes (Vivad Se Vishwas) Act dispute remains unresolved.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Court if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.

Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income… — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF IVARCH

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR

¶8

LT.T.A. NO: 439 OF 2016

¶9

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.899/Hyd/2015 for Assessment Year 2010-11, dated 1710212016 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Xl, Hyderabad in Appeal No.0312 to 314 & 317lCC-s Hyd/ClT(A)-l 13-14114-15 dated 24104120'15 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-l(3) in PAN/GlR No.ACAPG1085F dated 1 5-6-201 5.

¶10

Between:

¶11

Gawa Amarender Reddy,

¶12

...APPELLANT

¶13

AND

¶14

The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 2(3), Hyderabad

¶15

...RESPONDENT

¶16

For the Appellant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM KIRAN, Advocate

¶17

For the Respondent : NONE APPEARED

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

TH E TIONOTIRA BLE SRI .IL STICE }{.S. R-A,},IACI I,\N DRA R,AO

¶20

._\t)

¶21

TllE HO)-OUIIABLE SRt JL SI-ICI 1.. 't\OI) Kt ]1.\R

¶22

I.'1..'l'...\o.J-l9 ol 2{) I (r

¶23

J L:DG}I E NT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Raniachi ndra Rao)

¶24

Learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdrau. this Appeal to approach the respondents under the Direct Taxes (Vivad Se Vishwas) Act,2020.

¶25

Having regard to the said submission, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach this Court in the event there is no resolution o1'the dispute of thc petirioner with the l)epartment Lrncler the sai<i Act. No costs.

¶26

As a scqLrcl. uriscelltrneous pctitions pcndine. il..tn1,, shall stand

¶27

c lo seci .

¶28

¶29

I]d/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' Qt

¶30

SECTION OFFICER To 1 The lnc^ome_Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A, liyderabad 2. One CC to Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, Advocate (OpUC) 3. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DArED:1710312021

JUDGMENT

ITTA.No.439 of 2016

dES A
(
q' t
oo ()SAPR
o
il
*
7
..7

¶37

ITTA DISMISSED AS WITHDRAW N NO COSTS.

¶38

Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Dawood Kaif Vs The State of Telangana

Colonial Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Narayanam Nageswar Rao

Cheruku Swamy Nathan Vs Venisetty Rathnam and 5 others

Pingle Vasudeva Reddy Vs Chikkala Chowdarayya

Mr. Y. Ravichand Vs The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and 2 Others

Sahjanand Singh Vs The State of Telangana and Another