Dismissed

Smt. Pisarla Suryakala and Another v. M.V. Hanumantha Rao and 2 Others

Telangana HC1 Dec 2021CRP/611/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A civil revision petition seeking review of execution warrants was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Telangana. The court allowed the petitioners liberty to file a fresh revision if required.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh revision petition, if required. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

Smt. Pisarla Suryakala and Another Vs M.V… — Execution and Attachment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

't'::n'ut^{toul'iroloEHi}

¶2

Bfr,u^{o, TELAN.ANA}

¶3

*uolf,3oi{;,i3^.,iJiTfi;EoFTDEcEMEER

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

IHE HON ,BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA

¶6

RED DY

¶7

CIVIL RE sro NP ETI to N N :6 11 OF 21

¶8

Petition under Article 227 of the dated Constitution of lndia aggrieved b Y the order 24.03.2021 in E.A. No.33 of 2O1e in E.P. No. 30 of 2018 in O.S. No. 1198 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the R.R. District XVI Additional District Judge, at I,4alkajgiri,

¶9

Between:

¶10

, 8lj;"[islla Suryakata, Wo. p. Narsimha Reddy, Ased 46 years, occ.

¶11

, 3:; td.rT,,i"Narsimha Reddy, S/o Ramachandra Reddy, Aged about 56 years,

¶12

of H.No.4-1-106/3, Bhavaninasar, street No. 2 Nacharam,

¶13

ffxHt%[:;|3ents

¶14

...PETITIONERS/CLAIM PETITIONERS

¶15

AND

¶16

1 Itrl.V. Hanumantha Rao, S/o. Anjaneyulu, Aged.62 years, Occ. Business, Rio H. No. 1B-20l1 , Gopatnagar, fVatkajdiri, Hyd'erabad-500047.

¶17

...RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER

¶18

G. Padmaja, Wio. G, Dattatreya Prasad, Aged 52 Years, Occ. Housewife, Resident of Flat No. 303, Vaishnavi Chitiprolu Nilayam, Green Hills Colony, Road No 1, Saroonagar, Hyderabad.

¶19

G. Dattatreya Prasad, S/o. G. Uma lt4a heshwa raia h, Aged about 54 Years, Occ. Private Employee, Resident of Flat No. 303, Vaishnavi Chitiprolu Nilayam, Green Hills Colony, Road No 1, Saroonagar, Hyderabad.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MALIPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY

¶22

Counsel forthe Respondents: NONE APPEARED

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

-**,,

¶25

HON'BLE^{iRI JUSTICE A' VENKATESHWARARE'DDY} vrslON^{PETITIONNo.611of2021} clv^tLRE

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

I. Heard^{1 re learned counselt-or petitionets'Perttsed the letter} dated 16.07.2(^21.

¶28

In viev of subsequent^{changes, now, the petitioners intend to} challenge the issuance of^{warants of attachmentin E.P.No.30of 2018} in O.S.No.1l )8 of 2017 on the file of XIV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddl District at Malkajgiri.

¶29

Accon ingly, while recording the submissions of the learned counsel for retitioners, this civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn v ith liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh revision petition, if re luired. No order as to costs.

¶30

Pendir^q n.riscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶31

,TRUE COPY//

¶32

SD/.N.CHANDRA^{SEKHAR RAO} ASSISTANT REGISTRAR r_lo

¶33

SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

The XVI Additir nal District^{Judge at Malkaigiri, R.R District}

¶36

One CC to Sri /alipeddi^{Srinivas Reddy, Advocate} IOPUC]

¶37

Two CD Copie

¶38

One Spare Co1^y s br

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^011121i021

ORDER

CRP.No.611 o'2021

(i._i HE ST4 I€:
a- 1)
1t)
,() 23 .rf:::1
'r "r'
\ tt.

¶45

DISMISSING THE CRP AS WITHDRAV/N

¶46

-1,\ 1)-

Smt. Pisarla Suryakala and Another v. M.V. Hanumantha Rao and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Pisarla Suryakala and Another v. M.V. Hanumantha Rao and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Injamuri Pavani , Gayathri Vs Injamuri Shekar

Uma Maheshwari Challa Vs Pendyala Chaitanya Reddy

Smt.Guduru Sneha Vs Guduru suresh

Kommuru Venkayamma Vs Aduri Rojamma

Kommuru Venkayamma Vs Aduri Rajamma

Dudipala Venkat Papi Reddy and 3 others Vs Rakonda bheem Reddy and 3 others