Dismissed

Chintha Narsubai, Karimnagar Dist and Two Others v. Deepak Upadhyay, Adilabad Dist

Telangana HC5 Aug 2021CRP/480/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution for non-prosecution. No representation was filed by the petitioners despite the matter being listed multiple times, and no proof of service of notice was established.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition No. 480 of 2017 dismissed for non-prosecution.

Chintha Narsubai, Karimnagar Dist and Two… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 480 OF 2017

¶6

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order daled 26-12-20'16 passed in 1.A.No.756 of 2015 in O.S.No.75 of 2012 on the file of the Courl of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Ir,4ancherial District.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Chintha Narsubai, W/o. Late Narsaiah, Aged 58 years, occupation: Housewife, Rl/o. H.No.3-6-85, Vani Nagar, Jagityal, Karimnagar District.

¶9

Pilli lt/eghamala, W/o. Kishan, Age: 42 years, occ: Govt. employee, Ft/o. H.No. 1 3-792, Medariwada, lVlancherial, Adilabad District.

¶10

Pilli Ashalu, S/o. Late Lingaiah, Age: 65 years, occupation: Ivledari works, R/o. H.No. 13-792, lt/edariwada, Mancherial, Adilabad District.

¶11

.,.PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS

¶12

AND

¶13

Deepak Upadhyay, S/o. Kanaiyalal Upadhyay Age: 34 years, occupation: Business, Fl/ o. lvlancherial, Adilabad Dlstrict.

¶14

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYPLAINTI FF

¶15

CRPMP. NO: 618 OF 2017

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.75 of 2012 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, lVlancherial.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P. PRABHAKAR REDDY (Not Present)

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent: ---

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI ]USTICEB' VI]AYSENI1EDDY} c vil^{Rev lsl onPetition} o. 0 of o 7

¶22

9B9.EB:

¶23

was listed^{on 22,07} '2021^{therewas r o representation for} When the^matter matter^{was directed to be list€d on29 'O7 '2027"} the Petitioners.^The On 29.O7.2O[lwhen^{the matterwas taken up' there was no representationfor the} petitioners and^{this Court observed that by order dated24'03'2OL7' noticewas} that no^{proof of service is filed'Therefore'} ordered^{and the record shows} be listed^{under the caption "For Dismissal"} the matter^{was directed to} on 05.08.2021.

¶24

Today, though^{the matter is listed underthe caption fc r dismissaland called} Hence,^{this CoJrtdoes not have anv} there is^{no representationfor the petitioners'} alternative^{except to dismiss the petition'}

¶25

Accordingly,^{this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution'} There shall^{be no} MiscellaneousapplicationS,ifanypending,shallstandclost:d.

¶26

order as^{to costs.}

¶27

AS:irSflftrsAJXfl"#iil //TRUE^COPY// Go

¶28

SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

To' civil^{Judge at Mancherial' Adilabadt)istrict} 1. The^{PrinciPalSenior}

¶30

One^{CC to Sri P Prabhakar Reddy' Advocate [OPUC]}

¶31

i Two CD^CoPies i. on"^{SPare coPY} gbrts

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0510812021

ORDER

CRP.No.480 of 2017

E S'rAI€
I
(
oo B3 si??0t1 J
.n
t- Dtr ".r'I

¶37

DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON PROSECUTION

Chintha Narsubai, Karimnagar Dist and Two Others v. Deepak Upadhyay, Adilabad Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chintha Narsubai, Karimnagar Dist and Two Others v. Deepak Upadhyay, Adilabad Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Enukonda Malla Reddy Vs Pendyala Janardhan Reddy and 4 Others

Madisetti Naga Raju, Vs Kakarla Rami Reddy

Smt. E. Sharada Bai , Smt. Sharada Vs Smt Rangamma

Sri Sanjay Agarwal Vs Sri Bhupendra Narayan Surti

Raunak Bhandari and another Vs Sri ChamarthiMallikarjuna Ramakrishna and 4 others

Boinapally Ravinder Rao , Warangal and Another Vs Kasam Pradeep Kumar, Hyd and Another