Civil Revision under Article 227 challenging an order directing deposit of sale consideration. Petitioner argued for extension of time and appointment of advocate commissioner due to land disputes but was dismissed as the order was passed by consent.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed with costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDTJREABIITEOF TELANGANA
MONDAY-,THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONt'"
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL R EVISION PETITION NO: 183 oF 2021
Petition under Articre 227 0f constitution of rndia aggrieved by the order dated02'12'2020 in r.A. ru_o.. !s-s of 201tin o-..s. rio. roo ot2019on the fire of the court of the v Additionar District Juage ai ahongi;, I{atgonaa District.
Between:
smt K^anuri Annapurna, w/o.K.prasjld, Aged about 62 years, occ. Business, R/o.Frat No.203, Royal Paviilion Apartment, Ganesi Nagii,-Aml6rpet, Hyderauio-sbo bi6.
...PETITIONER
AND
G.Shiven{er fgQdy, S/o late G.Ram Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, H.No.8-2-293lB2lAl171(West Part),ptot No. I zt, Road N6. 13, Jubilee Hilts, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the orders dated.02l1212020 passed in 1.A.No.955 of 2019 in O.S.No.100/2019 on the file of V Additional District Bhongir, Nalgonda District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. ESWARAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLEDT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER 2 I I N
ORDER
This Civil RevisionPetition,under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,isfiled by the petitioner/plaintiff, challenging the docket order, dated02.72.2020,passedin I.A.No.955 of 2019 in O.S.No.100 of 2019 bythe V Additional District Judge at Bhongir, whereby, thepetitioner/plaintifFwas directed to deposit the undisputed balance sale consideration to the credit of the subject suit in O.S.No.100 of 2019 by way of demand draft in the name of the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Nalgonda, on or before 09.02.2027.
Dr.SA, J CRP ^"o.183 ol 202t
to measure the land and ultimately requested fhis Court to extend the time to deposit the balance sale consideration.
"Whether the impugned docket order, dated O2.L2.2O2O' passed in I.A.No.955 of 2O19 in O.S.No.lOO of 2019 by the V Additiona! District Judge at Bhongir is liable to be set aside; or time to deposit balance sale consideration as ordered by the Court below in the impugned docket order be extended?"
Dr.S'4'J CRP:o183of 2011
in theplaint that she is readyand willingto perform her part of contract,it is not appropriate to allow this CivilRevisionPetition asprayed for. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner inthe trial Court agreed for the deposit of the balance sale considerationin Court'The subjectorder was passed with consent.Underthesecircumstances,therearenomeritseven togrant extensionof time as requested by the learned counsel for thepetitioner/plaintiff' This CivilRevisionPetitionis devoid of merit andis liable to be dismissed'
No 6 Accordingly, thisCivit RevisionPetition is dismissed' costs.
Miscellaneouspetitions, ifany, pending in this Civil Revision Petition,shall standclosed.
Sd/-B.SATYAVATHI ASSTSTANT ffitsrnnn //TRUE COPY// SECTIOi( OFFICER
To
1 . The V AdditionalDistrict at Bhongir,NalgondaDistrict' 2. One CC toSRl. G ESWARAIAHAdvocate[OPUC] 3. Two CD CoPies
\
HIGH COURT
DRSAJ
DATED:0810212021
ORDER
1 H E rg
,(
o 19 rEB 2021 o
CRP.No.183 of 2021
D]SN4ISSING THE CRP WITHOUTCOSTS
u,Bhil >)t"4*-.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned docket order directing deposit of balance sale consideration is liable to be set aside.
Whether time to deposit the balance sale consideration as ordered by the Court below ought to be extended.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
smt K^anuri Annapurna
G.Shiven{er fgQdy
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
