In this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, the High Court of Telangana directed the trial court to decide a partition suit within one year following the Court's review of the record and prior checkered litigation.
Directed the learned V Additional District Judge to dispose of O.S.No.209 of 2015 within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1202 OF 2020
Petition under Adticle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggiieved by the Order dated in OS No.209/20'15 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Judge, Ranga
Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar
Solr,wen:
_ l. Mohesfruci D/o. Lote penloioh.
f .\9d obout 27 yeors. Occ: Employeo,
/2. parneshudi
-Dlo. Lote penroioh.
,\9€d obout 24 )ieors. Occ: Sfudent.
/1 Mohesh S/o. Lote pentoioh,
Aged oboul 22 yeors, Occ: pvt. SeMce,
Conesfnogq. !S R/o. x. No. Xotedon. t&t3€/le, R.R. Dlbhicu r
...Petitioners
Ard
l. Soyoni Venkoiommo @ Vonkommo
penroioh. osed obour aJyeors.
. Ii?:!"]i
Lrccupotton: Household,
,2.loVogrvtodhu Mohon S/o. Lole pentoioh.
Aqed: Mojor. occ: Not known to m" F"iiiion.o.
z 3. Soloni Srinivos S/o. lole penloioh,
Aged: Mojor. Occ: Nol known lo lhe pelilionen,
' .{. Soyoni Romesh S/o. Lote pentoi:h,
,\ged: Mojor. Occ: Nol known to lhe pelilionen.
<br>5. Soyoni Rolxhwori W/o. R. Bolokishno,
Aged: Moior, Occ: Not known lo lho pelilionen.
6. Soyoni Roikumor S/o. Lole penloioh,
Aged: Molcr, Occ: Nol known lo lhe pelitioners,
Respondenh I lo 6 ore R/o. H. No. t-t-t)Z2lif,tilA,
Hcnnogcr. Zomislonpur, Hyderobodl.
<br>7. Ropshr,vori D/o. Lole penloioh,
Aged oboul:2g yeors,
Occ: Not known io lhe petitioners,
R/o. Nol known lo lhe petitionels.
...Respondenls
...Petitioners
\
I
I
_ '. -..^,:
/-
I
t
l I
I1 I
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under S 'ction 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed there! ith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to change the natur : of the land, pending of the suit
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under S rction 32 R/w. 12 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit iled herewith, the High Court may be pleased to permit to prosecute the case by c,scharging mother of the petitioner
For the Petitioners : St I VIJAY B. PAROPAKARI, Advocate
Forthe Respondent N< s.1 to 7 : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the follc ring: ORDER
\
t {
! I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEA. VENKATESIIWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISIONP ETI-l'lONNo. 1202 of 2020
I
ORDER:
rrt
2
\
AVR, I CRP,No.1202 of2020
3, Having re lard to thecheckeredlitigation between the parties, request of thep, titionersfor expeditiousdisposalof the originalsuit and also considt:ingthe pendencyon the file of that Court,I deem it fit to direct thelearned V Additional DistrictJudge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.N agarto take all possiblesteps tbr expeditiousdisposal of the original srit o.S.No.209 ol 2015 at the earliest possible, under any circumstanc)s not later than one year fromthe dateo1- receiptof a copyofthisor<er.Thepartiestothesuitshallco-operatewiththe Court belowfor expeditious disposalas directed'
lications, if any,shallstand closed. Pending r tiscellaneous app
sd/-N.CHANDRASEKHARRAO ASSISTA\TREGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYII lL\
\
SECTIONOFFICER
To
at L BNasar
1 2 . 3X""[3i:'l1i$?i'g:$j:"q,%?'?;IXX[:ti3i":'St 3. TwoCD CoPies 4. One SPareCoP Kj
HIGH COURT
DATED:061121202'l
ORDER
CRP.No.1202 ol 2020
{
rn
DISPOSING OFTHE ( RP WITHOUT COSTS.
t
t-
<br>)4 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court has the power under Article 227 to direct the trial court to dispose of a pending partition suit within a specified timeframe.
Whether a direction for expeditious disposal is appropriate given the checkered litigation history between the parties.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mohesfruci D/o. Lote penloioh.
Soyoni Venkoiommo @ Vonkommo penroioh.
Ropshr,vori D/o. Lote penloioh.
A. Venkateswara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
