The High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision petition for default as the appellant failed to present representation on the date summoned, despite the higher bail petition being pending.
The Criminal Revision Case was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 67 OF 2008
Crl.Revision Case Under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.p.C. against the judgment dated 21-01-2008 in crl.A.No. 223 o'f 2007 on the fite of the court of the Metropolitan sessions Judge at Hyderabad preferred against the order dated 1206-2007 in c.c. No. 744 ol 2004 on the of the court of the lt Additionat chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.
Between:
V.SHANKARAIAH, S/o, Ir/aIIaiah, Driver,APSRTC bus bearing No. AP-10/2-6958 Manthani Depot, Karimnagar District
...PETITIONER/ Appellant / Accused
AND
The State of A.P., rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT/ Respondent i Complainant
CRLRGMP. NO: 99 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the execution of sentence and release the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the above Crl. RC
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. MOHAN RAMI REDDY ( not present )
Counsel for the Respondent: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLEDT. ]USTICESHAMEEM AKTHER
CriminalRevisionCase No'67 of 2O08
ORDER
On 16.11.2021,there was no representation for the revision petitioner.Therefore, the matter was posted"for orders" today' Even thenthere is no representation for the revisionpetitioner'It appearsthat the revision petitioner has no interest to pursue the m atte r.
this CriminalRevisionCase is 2. Under thesecircumstances' dismlssedfor default'
MiscellaneCUspetitionS,ifany,pendlnginthisCriminal
RevisionCase, shall standclosed'
sD/.cHVEffirE:H|tTHkH 'rRUEcoPY/' tEcrroru#ilrn
tEcrroru#ilrn
iiliHflttnlift"",:&:ii}lefi#jgf#*ili.:'h:j:t1lxrsmvsranv
o. l?i3tn3l3(S*'rtkoro RAMr REDDY Advocate [oPucl
3: IH"'3Bf"".lt'3:toror Police' sultan Bazar' Hvderabad'
TR
"{+,-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811'112021
ORDER
CRLRC.No.67 of 2008
H E s TA 14:
e
I -)
() 0 4 DECzoA
*
k
5.q ..'n:f C
DISMISSING THE CRL.R,C. FOR DEFAULT.
o )A
.2n
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V. Shankaraiah
State of A.P.
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
