Partly allowed

Sama Sanjeev Reddy and 2 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC16 Dec 2021CRLP/9588/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a charge sheet. The investigating officer had filed the charge sheet, and the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the chargesheet. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file fresh petition challenging the charge sheet. Criminal petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Sama Sanjeev Reddy and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶3

AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry ONE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9588 OF²⁰²¹

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sama Sanjeev Reddy, S/o. Late Narshima^{Reddy, aged about 56 years,Occ.} Agricultural,

¶10

Sama Swetha Reddy, D/o. Sanjeeva Reddy,^{Aged.30years, Occ. Household,} 3. Sama Sravya, D/o. Sanjeeva Reddy, Aged^{25 years, Occ. Doctor,} (All are R/o. H.No, 3-14214, Shanthi Nagar, Kalvaricha Village, Hayathnagar Mandal' Ranga Reddv District ) ...pETrroNERS/AccusED No.6 To⁸

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Through SHO,^{PS, It4aheshwaram, Rep by Public} Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶13

B.V.Satish Kumar, Sio.B.H.Purusthotham,^{Aged about 50 Years, Occ. Business,} R/o.HlG-229, BHEL Township, Ramachandrapuram,^Hyderabad.

¶14

..,RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition, the High Court may be pleased} to quash the complaint and investigation^{in Crime No.150of 2021,dated.0310712021} on the file of the 1"t respondent Maheshwaram^{Police, Rachakonda, in the courtof} the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge^{-cum -XXVIl Additional MetropolitanMagistrate} Cyberabad at Maheshwaram as against^{the Petitioner/AccusedNo'6, 7 and 8 and} grant

¶16

LA. NO: 1OF 2021

¶17

Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c^{praying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal^{Petition, the High courtmay be pleased} to^grant stay of all further^{proceedings against the petitioners herein in crime No.'l 50} of 2021, dated. O3lO7l2O21 on the^{file of the 1't respondent MaheshwaramPolice,} Rachakonda, in the court of the^{Hon'bleJunior civil Judge-cum -XXVllAdditional} It4etropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad^{at Maheshwaram}

¶18

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and^{uponhearing theargumentsof} STi.K.RAJASHEKAR, Advocate^{for the Petitionersand of the Public Prosecutoron} behalf of the Respondent No.1 and^{None Appeared for the RespondentNo.2.}

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{K. LAKSHMAN}

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9588^{OF 2O2L}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

The learned Public Prosecutor,^{on instructions, would} submit that the Investigating^{Officer in Crime No.15O of 2027} pending on the file of Maheshwaram^{PoliceStation, Rachakonda} has already completed investigation^{and filed charge sheetand} the same was^given C.C.No.328^{of 2021.}

¶24

In view of the same, the^{learned counselfor petitioner seeks} permission to withdraw the criminal^{petition with a liberty to file} fresh petition challenging^{the very chargesheet itself'}

¶25

Granting liberty as^{soughtfor, this criminal petitionis} dismissed as withdrawn.^{Miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any,}

¶26

sha11 stand closed.

¶27

Sd/-N.CHANDRASEKHAR^RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPYII , lrl--

¶28

SECTION OFFICER

¶29

To 1. The Junior Civil Judge-cum-^{XXVII Additional MetropolitanMagistrate,} Cvberabad. at Maheswaram.

¶30

2 Tfre Station House Officer, Maheswaram^{Police Station, Rachakonda'}

¶31

3 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor,^{HighCourt for the State of Telangana,} Hvderabad^(OUT)

¶32

4 Oire CC to Sri K.Rajashekar,^{Advocate (OPUC)}

¶33

5 Two CD Copies

¶34

One Spare Copy

{

) )

HIGH COURT

DATED:1611212021

ORDER

CRLP.No.9588 ol 2021

itrE Slei4
o;
I
oJ
1 7 JAU 2022
i!l
.2o
.-,4
{)
?F.. r' ^

¶43

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS WTIHDRAWN.

¶44

ua
/o

Sama Sanjeev Reddy and 2 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sama Sanjeev Reddy and 2 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.G.Suresh Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Dr.a.Yogender Swamy Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Avinash Melwani and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Bendra Thirupathi Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Mandela Rajesh Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Bala Reddy Gopu Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Tds