A.l, lre adrritted that he entered into conspiracy with Nasir for transportation of Ganja on 08.07.2020 and they left fron Haryana on 09.07.2020 and reached Delhi on 10.07 2020 and went to electronic shop run by A.2 on rental basis. During the cDR a,alysis or rnobire nurnber of B.2, it is ernerged that he is consistently in touch with A.2 and which corroborarecl with their voluntary statements Lrnder Section 67 of the NDpS Act. Further. during the course of panchanarna proceedings, the toll receipts of toll plazas starting from Vernpadu toll plaza to Rajendranagar toil praza" totar il toil plaza receipts. were seized in the presence of independent rvitnesses and printtt iactc the cornplarut reveals the connection of the accused to the allegecl crirne. F.rther. several contentions that are raised by the petitioner cannot be gone into by this court at this stage. while grant bail to A.2, no reasons were assigned and though charge sheet is filed w'ithin lg0 days, without recording reasons bail was granted. Further, it appears, prosecution also filed petition for cancellation of bail. Further, petitioner could not satisty the ingredients of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, as such, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
