Allowed

Belda Bharath Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Feb 2021CRLP/92/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal petition seeking modification of bail conditions. The High Court allowed the petition, modifying requirements for a foreign journey ticket copy and reducing the caution deposit from Rs.5 lakhs to Rs.1 lakhs.

What did the court decide?

Condition No.6 modified to require only boarding pass copy; Condition No.9 modified to require Rs.1 lakh deposit. Petitioner directed to appear personally for Section 313 Cr.P.C. examination.

Belda Bharath Kumar Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 92 OF 20²¹

¶6

Between:

¶7

Belda Bharath Kumar, S/o. B.Pentaiah, aged 29 years, Occupation: Software Engineer Hindu, Presently, R/o. H.No. 18-266, IVallikarjun Nagar, It4alkajgiri, Hyderabad 500047. Residing at. Flat No. 26. Sedona House, B Victory Parade, East London E201FX.

¶8

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED A.1

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶11

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the l,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the conditions No. 6 and I of the Orders passed in CRL.M.P.No. 483 of 2020, in C.C. No. 4708 of 2018, on the file of the Honourable ll Metropolitan Magistrate, at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri L. N. BHADRIRAJU ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Addl Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

¶14

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶15

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶16

CRIMINAL PETITION No.92 0F 202r

¶17

ORDER,:

¶18

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/A-1 seeking modification of condition Nos.6 and 9 of the order dated O2.OL.2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No.483 of 2O2O in C.C.No.47O8 of 2018 on the file'of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/A- 1 , the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State and perused the record.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to modify condition Nos.6 and 9 of order dated 02.O1..2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No.483 of 2O2O in C.C.No.4708 of 2018 on the file of the V^Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar.

¶21

Accordingly, the Criminal^{Petitionisallowed and} condition No.6 is^{modified to the effectthat the petitioner/A-1} shall furnish only the^{Xerox copy of the boarding pass/ticket} showing the date^{of his journeyto abroad and he need not} produce copy of his^{return journey ticket'Similarly,} condition No.9 is^{modified to theextent thatthe} petitioner/A-1 shall deposit^{an amount of Rs'1,00,000/-by} way of fixed deposit^{beforethe Court concernedby way of} caution deposit^{instead of Rs.S lakhs, as orderedearlier'}

¶22

¶23

Further, the petitioner/A- 1 shall^{personally appear before the} Court concerned on the date of framing charges, if^any, under Section 24O Cr.P.C., for his examination under^{Section 313} Cr.P.C. and also on the date of^{judgment without fail'}

¶24

Miscellaneous applications, if any,^pending shall^stand

¶25

closed.

¶26

SDII.NA GALAKSHMI EGIS ASSISTANT ,TRUE^COPY// SECTIO OFFICE^R

¶27

i,ii:X,f.,}}tffii*:*8"$:U{',f.{.iii"#r*fu1"j,"," Hish^{court for the Stateof Telangana at}

¶28

; *ttJ"'i",xfl;0,'" "ot""utor' Advocate roPUc]

¶29

. BX:"J3?30,[?flJ' ",..oo*TRAJU

¶30

Two^C.D.CoPies

¶31

HIGH COURT

¶32

DATED:01 10212021

¶33

krE TA rt
oo 0 5 t EB 2021 t.

¶34

ORDER

¶35

CRLP.No.92 of^202'l

¶36

ALLWOING^{THE CRL.PETITION.}

¶37

.D(t
ffi+
0

Belda Bharath Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Belda Bharath Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gudise Govindu, S/o Edanna Vs Narsimha Naik, S/o Lokiya Naik

Janga Raghava Reddy Vs State of Telangana

K.Uma Devi and Another Vs The State of Telangana

Veenavanka Sai Teja Bannu Vs The State of T.S

Sri Sitanshu Agarwal Vs State of Telangana

Neeraj Tivari and 3 others Vs State of Telangana