Dismissed

Islavath Ramjya v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC30 Nov 2021CRLP/7984/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in Telangana heard a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding an NDPS charge where no drugs were recovered. The Court refused pre-arrest bail but directed the petitioner to surrender before the lower court to move a regular bail application.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender and move an ordinary bail application before the Court concerned.

Islavath Ramjya Vs The State of Telangana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA , AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF NOVEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶5

C RIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 7984 0F 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

lslavath Remjya, S/o. Seethya, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Aoriculture. K/o.Morsu I handa [/aredgu Village, padara Mandal, Nagarkurnool Distiict.

¶8

.., Petitioner/Accused

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telanoana through SHO_padara, represented by its public Prosecutor, High C"ourt of Teta"ngana, HvOL?aIaJi^---

¶11

...RespondenUComplainant

¶12

Petition under section 438 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondent police to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his attest in cr No 61 0f 2021 pending on the fire of SHo padara porice, Nagar Kurnoor District, by granting anticipatory bail in the interest of justice.

¶13

This^petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri R. Janaki Ram, Advocate for the petitioner and the Assistant pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent.

¶14

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶15

HON'BLE^{SI IT. JUSTICELALITHA KANNEGANTT} PETITI N o.79 t 2021 CRIMI

¶16

OR DER:

¶17

This^{petition is filed under Section438 of Cr'P'C'seeking bail to} petitioner/accused^{in the event of his arrest in connectionwith Crime} of Padara^{Police Station' Nagarkumool District'} No.6l of²⁰²¹ registered^{for the o lencepunishable underSection20(aXi) ol the} Narcotic^{Drugs and PsychotropicSubstancesAct'1985 (for brevitY} "NDPS^Act")'

¶18

Heard^{Mr'R'J rnakiram' learned counsel for the petitioner'and} learned^{Assistant Pub ic Prosecutor for the respondent-State'} 3. Leamed^{totr115':1 for the petitioner submits that nothing has been} recovered^{fromthep lssession of petitioner'tn view of the differences} between^{petitionerar J A'1' petitionerhas been implicatedfalsely in this} case.^{Learnedcounst1 fileda certificate'dated04'10'202 f issued by the} Sarpanch^{of Maradu 9u Village'wherein certain mediations weretaken} place^{between petiti)nerand A'1's brother'Hence'his case may be} considered^{tbr grantrf pre-arrest bail'}

¶19

ave^{committed the offence under} 4. The Petitione^{is allegedto h} This^{Court is not inclinedto grant} Section^{20taXi) of 'ne NDPS Act'} pre-arrest^bail'

¶20

" - -- "'l-',",,its^{that A'1 wasalready} Learned^{cou.sel for the petitio':: t::::".,ioner} 5. wi,^surrender enlarged^{on bail' iherefore'he submits that petl} before^{the Courtb:low and move an appropriateapplicationseeking} bail.

¶21

¶22

'l - ^-'rn'nu' petition^{is disposed of' The petitioner is}

¶23

1. AccordinglY'^{the crt} directed^{to surrender before the Courtconcemed'and on such sunender} and moving^{an appropriateapplication for bail' the Court concemed} shall consider^{the same'in accordancewith law'}

¶24

Miscellaneous^{petitions, pendingif any' shallstand closed'}

¶25

-'.83*''SD/.K.ONESIM

¶26

//TRUE^COPY//

¶27

ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR iy

¶28

SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

To, t The Judicial^{First Class Magistrate'at Achampet"} " 2. The^{StationHou'" otti"lT'"p"''o"ai'i*orit" stution'Nagar Kurnool District} 3. Two^{ccs to the n"i'tu'iib''[lJ'itot"t'to'' High court for the State ot} " iurrngrnr, at HYderabad IoUTI

¶30

'<i""'6c t" sri i Janaki RLm' Advocate [oPUc]

¶31

" 5. Two^{CD CoPies}

¶32

One^{Spare CoPY}

MMK t- TR {

...-..-

HIGH COURT

DATED:3O11112O21

ORDER

CRLP.No.7984^{ot 2)21}

¶39

E Sl4.^. ,s 1i^DEC2iP1

¶40

DISPOSING^{( )F THE CRIMINAL PETITION}

¶41

l3 t?,

Islavath Ramjya v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Islavath Ramjya v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harsha Upadrashta Vs The State of Telangana

Mrs. Sree Lakshmi Upadrashta Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Phani Bhushan Upadrashta Vs The State of Telangana

P. Savitha , Vaishnavi Vs P. Naresh and 4 Others

K.V. Phani Chandra Mouli Vs Smt. K.Veena

Rayudu Johnson Vs The State of Telangana