In this criminal petition, the petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, facing charges for offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The court rejected the prayer, deeming the allegations heinous, and directed surrender within 15 days.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERAB,AD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CRIMINAL PETITI ON NO: 5077 OF 2021
Between:
Kiran Tidke, S/o. Manjkrao. Aged about 27 Vears, Occ. Emolovee. R/o. H No.'1 -93. I,4uthnoor, Gudihathhoor. Adilabad Disirict. Tetangana.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
...Proposed RespondentNo.2
Petition under section 438 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with in crime No. 54 of 2019, dated.06.06.2019, Uls. 417, 420,316 of tpC and 6 of pOCSO Act on the file of the Police Station Gudihatnoor, Adilabad District, Telangana.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing lhe [V]emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. R. Mangulal, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri. Raju Gundyala, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI T}EVI
CRIMINAL PETITION No.5077 of 2Q?.1
ORDER
The Criminal Petition, under Section 438 ol the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/A1 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.54 of 2019 on the file of Gudihatnoorrolice Station Adilabad District, registered for the offences under Sections 4'1 7. 420.376 IPC and under Section 6 of POCSO Act.
the 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for
petitioner/A'1 , learned Assistant Public Prosecutor aprearing for the respondent-State and perused the record.
2
shall stand dismissed.
SD/- K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SE TION O ICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1810812021
ORDER
CRLP.No.5077 of 2021
OF 1 € lA € o}.<br>:<br>)
:)
1 4 sEP 20n C)
4-.f
*
t fF..'.*a! .ri0
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
,.5s1
>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court ought to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest.
Whether the allegations in the FIR indicate heinous crimes that would preclude the grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kiran Tidke
State of Telangana
Sharada Gedam
G. Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
