Dismissed

V. Ramakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Jul 2021CRLP/2978/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana, while hearing a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings for an offence under Section 354 IPC, dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon the court granting liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet filed based on completed police investigation.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet.

V. Ramakrishna Vs The State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2978 OF 2021

¶7

Betwee n:

¶8

V. Ramakrishna, S/o.Veeranna, Aged about 62 years, Occ Business, R/o. Flat No.6 86 7, 1st Floor, Dhruvyamini Apts, Street No,4, Habsiguda, H yd era bad.

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court, at Hyderabad.

¶12

2 Kalpana Panigrahi, D/o. Gopal Krushna Panigrahi, Aged about 23^years, Occ.Private Service, Rl/o. Kundara, Post Kundara, Jeypore (Koraput), Odisha.

¶13

...Respondents/Complainant

¶14

Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime.No.165 ol 2021 dated.30.03.2021 on the file of Police Station Panjagutta, Hyderabad for the alleged offence^punishable under Sec.354 of lPC.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the I,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{High Court may be pleased} to stay all further proceedings against^{petitione r/accu} sedⁱⁿ Crime.No.165^{of 2021 on} the file of Police Statron Panjagutta, Hyderabad for the alleged^{offence punishable} under Sec.354 of lPC.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^{[vlemorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri K. V. Janardhan} Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the^{Public Prosecutoron behalfof the} Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in^{person or by} Advocate.

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

THE IIO\OL'RAI]L[, SRI JI-]STICE^{K. LAKS}I\TAN}

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No.297t1 of 2021}

¶22

ORDEIT:

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor, on^{instructions,wouldsubmit that} the police have already completed^{investigationand filed chargesheet} in Crime No.165 of 2021. The^{same was taken on fie, vide} C.C.No.5922 of 2021.

¶24

In view of the same, leamed^{counsel for the petitionerseeks} pernrission of this Court to^{withdrawthe CriminalPetition rvith liberty} to f-rle tiesh petition challenging^{the very charge sheet itselt'}

¶25

Glanting liberty as sought fbr, the Criminal^{Petition is}

¶26

disnrissed as rvithdrawn.

¶27

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,^{shallstand dismissed.}

¶28

SD/- M. MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To, 1 The XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan^{Magistrate, at Nampally,Hyderabad'} 2 The Station House Officer, Panjagutta^{Police Station Hyderabad District'} 3 Tvio CCs to the Public Prosecutor,^{HighCourt for the State of Telangana, at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶32

4 One CC to Sri. K. V. Janardhan^{Rao, Advocate} [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies

¶33

6 One Spare Copy

IUMK

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1310712021

ORDER

CRLP.No.2978 of 2021

SlA) €
tt-
<br>c 02 AUG20[1
'j
\i-zz -l
D t: ai r, A.-I c

¶41

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN

¶42

a-)
-b
h?/l

V. Ramakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Ramakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Chand Pasha Vs The State of Telangana

Koripelli Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

M/S Ladda Enterprises Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Podduturi Nagaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Duligunti Ravinder Reddy Vs State of Telangana and another

Venu Gopal , Naredla Venugopal Reddy Vs The State of Telangana