Dismissed

Sri Pappula Srinivas, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Aug 2021CRLP/290/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana heard two Criminal Petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing and stay of criminal proceedings. In the absence of the petitioner and no representation on his behalf, the Court dismissed the 2016 petition for lack of prosecution and ordered the closure of miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Sri Pappula Srinivas, Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

, PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 290 OF 2016

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sri Pappula Srinivas, S/o. Ramachandram Occ:Private Employee, Rl/o. H.No.4-2-41 , Near Ayyappa Temple, Annapurna Colony, IVedipalli Raod, Jyothinagar, NTPC, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶8

...PETITIONERYACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Public prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh

¶11

Bodla Anjaneyulu, S/o. Kailasam, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 21-2-6411 , Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 486 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial l\rlagistrate First Class at Godavarikhani

¶14

CRLPMP. NO: 362 OF 2016

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the^petitio ner/Accu sedⁱⁿ C.C. No.486 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial^N,4agistrate First Class at Godavarikhani pending disposal of the above criminal^petition

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.VENKATESWAR VARANASI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor^(TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of no one advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

THE HON'BLD JUSTICE G.SRI DE'UI

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.29O of 2016

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

When the matter is listed under the caption lor,,Final hearing,, none appears for the petitioner/ accused and there is no representation on his behalf.

¶22

The criminal Petition is of the year 2016. The petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the C:.iminal petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶23

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thi:; criminal petition

¶24

shall stand closed

¶25

¶26

Sd/.N.CIIANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' G"

¶27

SECTION OFFICER

¶28

¶29

The Hon'ble Judicial lvlagistrate of First Class, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District.

¶30

2 One CC to Sri Venkateswar Varanasi, Advocate (OpUC)

¶31

J Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT)

¶32

Two CD Copies

¶33

One Spare Copy Kj

HIGH COURT

DATED:04/08/2021

ORDER

CRLP.No.290 ol 2016

1 HE Sr4
)q >ll
a)i) 2 6 AU0202l C)z

D :.1r: ^ i C.!1(!
-
--i-:i__-E

¶39

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION

¶40

2-U

Sri Pappula Srinivas, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Pappula Srinivas, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Oswai Minerals Ltd., Secunderabad., Vs the State of Telangana,Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

D.Yadagiri, Waragal Dist. Vs G. Anad Reddy and Another Rep. by P.P.

Burra Srinivas Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Palvai Kotaiah and 7 Others Vs Palvai Geetha and Another

Achana Srinivas Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Shaik Siraj Vs The STate of Telangana