Allowed

Mohammed Omar Faisal, And 2 Others v. The State of Telangana, And Another

Telangana HC20 Dec 2021CRLP/2611/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court quashed criminal proceedings regarding dowry harassment and matrimonial disputes arising from a joint compromise settlement between the accused and the defacto complainant after recording an LSC report.

What did the court decide?

Quashed proceedings in C.C. No. 273 of 2018 and allowed Leave Applications Nos. 2 and 3 of 2021 upon payment of Rs. 5,000 to High Court Advocates Association.

Mohammed Omar Faisal, And 2 Others Vs The State of… — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

.!._

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

LA. OS.2A D3OF 2021 IN/AND MINA ETITI NO: 2 oF2 1

¶7

CRIMINAL P ETITION N O:2611 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 Mohammed omar Faisal, s/o. tvohammed Abdul evoom. Aoed about 4z vears Occ. unemployed, R/o.^permanent Fyo. H.No.6_1_342,"padmarao tijgar, Secunderabad-500 025

¶10

2 lt4ohammed Ab^dul Qyoom. s/o.Late shaik Ameen (wrongly shown as Late shaik lryee1)^{ASed 81 years, Occ. Retd. Employee, Fl/o. peimanent} R/o. H.No,6_1 342. Padmarao Nagar. Secunderabad-500 025.

¶11

3 l,4eher Qyoom (wrongly shown as lt4ohammed Meher eyoom), W/o. IMohd. Abdul Ay99It^{Ag.qd73 years,Occ.House wife,R/o. permanent R/o.H.No.6_1_342,} Hadmarao Nagar, Secu ndera bad-500 025,

¶12

.,. Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3

¶13

AND

¶14

1 If'qSt?tg^{of Telangana, represented by its public prosecutor,High Courtfor the} state oI Ietanga, at Hyderabad.

¶15

...Respondent

¶16

Smt..Fathimq lq1sq, W/o .\aohd. Om,arFaisal, Aged 37 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H.No.3-9-107, Misha Mansion, Krishnapuii Clolony, irVest wtlrieOpilty,^-' Secunderabad.

¶17

...RespondenUDefacto Complainant

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to c.c.No.273 of 2018 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolltan l,4agistrate, at Hyderabad City (pS WpS, Begumpet) to quash the same.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under section 482 of cr,P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings, including investigation, arrest and personal appearance of the Petitioner in C.C.No.273 of 2018 on the file of the XV Additional Chief lvletropolitan lvlagistrate, at Hyderabad City (PS WPS, Begumpet) pending the disposal of the Criminal Petition.

¶21

Gommon CTs in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2021 in Criminal Petition

¶22

Between:

¶23

Smt. Fathima^{f arisa. w/o. Mohd. omar Faisal, Aged 38 vears' occ Housewife'} R/o. H.No.3_9^{107, Misha'''iliri.io'n,-xrGri"ipuiicotony' v/est Marredpallv,} Secunderabad

¶24

...Petitioner/Respondent^{No'2/DefactoComplainant}

¶25

AND

¶26

The State^{of Tt langana, representedby its Public Prosecutor'High Courtfor the} State of Telanl^{a, at HYderabad'}

¶27

Mohammed^{O nar Faisal, S/o MohammedAbdul Qyoom' Aged about 47 years'} Occ. UnemPlo^'ed.

¶28

Mohammed^{; bdul Qyoom,S-/o} !ate.^{Straik Ameen (wrongly shownas Late} Shaik Ameefl^{\ged82 years, Occ RetdEmployee'}

¶29

l/eher Qvoom^{(wrongly shown as Mohammed Meher Qyoom)'Wio Mohd Abdul} Ayoom, Aged^'3 Years,^{Occ Housewile}

¶30

allarePermarentR/o.H.No.6-1-342,PadmaraoNagar,secunderabad-S00025

¶31

...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused^{No'1 to 3}

¶32

l.A. NO: 2 oF²⁰²¹

¶33

Petition unde Section^{320 (6) Readwith 482 of cr.P c prayingthat in the} circumstances^{stat€ i in the Nlemorandumof Grounds of criminal Petition, theHigh} Court may^{be plea ied to permit the petitioner and Respondent No 2 to 4 in CC} No.273 of 2018^{or the file of xv Additionalchief Metropolitan Magistrate'city} Criminal Courts,^{HY lerabad.}

¶34

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2021

¶35

Petition unde r section^{320 (2) Readwith 482 of cr.P.c prayingthat in the} circumstances^{stat( d in the Affidavit and Joint Memo of compromisefiled therewith,} theHighCourtmaybepleasedtorecordthecompromisebetweenthepetitionerand Respondent No.2^{t l4 and quash the proceedingsin CC No.273 of 201 8 on the file} of XV Additional cl^{ef lr,4etropolitan lvlagistrate,city criminalcourts'Hyderabad.}

¶36

This Petitior coming on^{for hearing, upon perusingthe lt/lemorandum of} Grounds of crimir al^{Petitionand upon hearing the arguments of sri Prabhakar} sripada, Advocate^{ior the Petitionerin criminal Petition and RespondentNos.2to 4} in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2021^{and the Public Prosecutor on behalfof the Respondent} No.1 in Criminal^{P, ,titionand l.A.Nos.2 and 3 0f 2021 andof sri H. SudhakaraRao,} Advocate for the t^{.espondentNo.2 in Criminal Petition and Petitioner in l.A. Nos.2} and 3 of 2021^.

¶37

The Court made tt^e following:^{COMMON ORDER}

¶38

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶39

I.A.Nos2 & 3ot202t IN/AND c NAL ?ION No. 26710F202t coMMoNORD ER:

¶40

This Criminal petition is filed by t}te petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 3 to quash the proceedings in C.C.No .223 of2o1g on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 49g-A and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry prohibition Act.

¶41

2' During the pendency of the present criminar petition, the parties have compromised the matter and, accordingly, respondent No.2-d.e facto comprainant filed i.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2021 to permit her to compound the offences and to compromise the case in C.C.No.273 of 2018.

¶42

Vide order dated. 07.12.2021., this Court, after recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondent No.2, directed the parties to appear before the SecretarSr, Telalgana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, on or before 17.I2.2O2I for their identification and a,1so directed the Secreta-rJi to submit a report by 17 .72.2021 . In compliance with the said order dated O7 . 12.2021 , the Secretar5z has submitted his report dated 15.12.2O21,

¶43

¶44

In^{the lrrport of the Secretary' TelanganaHigh Court} Legal^{Servicet Committee' Hyderabad' itis statedthat in} obedience^{of t re orders dated07'i2' 202t' ltre petitioners and} the 2'd^{respor dent have appeared before him along with their} counsel^{and on examination and veriiicationoftheir} particulars^{fr rm their Aadhar Carcls'they were talliedThus} the identifica^{ion of both the parties has been established'} 5. The^{pr Lrties herein have fiied a jointnlemo of} compromise.^{The said joint memo of compromiseand the} report of the^{Secretary are placed on record'}

¶45

The^{joi 1t memo would reveal that both the partieshave} settled^{dispr rtes between them amicably and also agreedto} withdraw th:^{cases filed by thery against each other inciuding} the present :ase^{vide C.C.No.273 of 2018 and 2"d respondent} has no ob ection to^{quash the proceedingsagainstthe} petitioners I .erein/A. 1 to A'4 in^{C.C.No.273 of 2018.}

¶46

In vier i the said report of the Secretary,^{Telangana High} Court Legal Services Comtnittee, Hyderabetd and^{also in view} of the cor: Lpromise entered between the^{petitionersand} respondent No.2, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 are a1lor.l,ed. Consequentll', the Crimin il Petition is allor.r,ed and the proceedings in C.C.No.273 of 2O1B on the file of the XV Additionai Chief Metropolita t Magistrate, at Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioners herein/A. 1 to 3 subject to payment of an amount of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand Oniy) to the Telangana High Court Advocates, Association, Hyderabad,

¶47

¶48

within ten (10) days from today, and file proof of the same into the Registry.

¶49

8 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶50

SD/- N.CHANDRA^SEKHARRAO ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR -/

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To, 1. The XV^{Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate'} .at^Hyderabad'

¶55

The Station^{gouseOtticer'G;ffidWo"men PoliceStation'Hvderabad}

¶56

a ?fl8ta.^{to the pubtic prosecutor,High court for the stateof retangana,at}

¶57

. ?;!"J::,.X1"1$,'#,unn"n,^{Hish courr Advocates,Association, Hish courtror the} State of^{Telangana,HYderabad}

¶58

6;; cc^{to sri"praunakar Sripada'Advocate!91991}

¶59

;. o;; cc^{io sri H. Sudhakara Rao' Advocate toPUCl}

¶60

' Two CD^CoPies iniong^{witl, a copy of the Joint Memo)}

¶61

MMK

¶62

¶63

Cost Note: Memo:Amount^{paidby Prabhakar Sripada' lowards imposed bv Costof Rs 10'000i-} (Ten thousand)^{t"'"i]"g'";'"iigh'ct"tAdvocates Asiociation'Hyderabad}

¶64

ReceiPt^{No. 5271 4, Dale: 24j22021}

!tr

HIGH COURT

DATED:2011212O21

COMMON ORDER

l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 ol 2121 ln/and

¶71

CRLP.No.26'11 of 20 ll

¶72

(\ lirE S14 /a
t c
o-)
z
2 3 irn 20pJ
ri

¶73

ALLOWING THE t.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2021 AND ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITiON

¶74

¶75

'u,,,.,ff }ioy#,:.::y#i:oo7f o,

¶76

IN THE HIGTI COUR T FOR THE S ATE OF"TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

I.A.No.

oF 2021

Cr P; No.2611 OF 2021

¶82

Between:

¶83

Smt. FATHIMA FARISA Wo. Mohd. Omar Faisat. tged; lB years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H. No. 3-e- 1 0 7, M i shi M"a n ii.i, j lliri,i."piir.i EJ,onr, West Marredpally, Secunderabad.

¶84

.....Petitioner/Respondent No.2/ Defacto Complainant

¶85

AND

¶86

1, The State ofTelangana

¶87

Rep, by its^public prosecutor,

¶88

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶89

MOHAMMED OMAR FAISAL

¶90

S/o. Mohammed Abdul eyoom,

¶91

Aged about 47 years, Occ: unemployecJ,

¶92

MOHAMMED ABDUL QYOOM

¶93

S/o. Late Shaik Ameen (wrongly shown as Late Shaik Ameer)

¶94

Aged 82 years, Occ: Retd. Employee,

¶95

MEHER QYOOM

¶96

(Wrongly shown as Mohammed Meher Qyoom)

¶97

W/0. Mohd. Abdul Ayoom, Aged 73 years, Occ: Housewife

¶98

All are Permanent R/o. H.No,6-1-342,

¶99

Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad-500 025.

¶100

.. Respondents/

¶101

.. Petitioners/Accused No.1 to3

¶102

JOINT MEMO

¶103

It is submitted that the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 to 4 have

¶104

resolved their differences and.disputes and ag reed to withdraw the followin s cases filed by them against each other: s1 y/4

1 i

&t?'

'i.

a, The^{Petltione ' agreedto withdraw C'C No273of 2018 on the file of 'W </sup> Additionat^{o ier uetroplri..'NrrsirtirL,ci,v ciriluj co"ti' rya9"Ptl$} filed aqainst^{t",pono"ii' t;'i;;;flil;;undersection agBA IPc'sectio} + and -6 of Dr wY Prohibition Act'}

¶111

b, The^{Petitionrr Agreed to withdrawDVC No'27 of 2021 on the flle of IV} Metropolitan^{fqagistrate,"Iaunoiun:unComplex.atHyderabad filedagainst} 'section 12 of Domestic Violence

¶112

Respondents^{No.2 to ;i.; ;+;t;;; under} Act.

¶113

c. The Petition:r^{agree to withdrawMC No'13of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble</sup> Judge: Fami^{y Coufts, City-iiuif Co,ttComplex, Secunderabadand agreed} to waive oft^{claimingp*rnin"ri uiimony and monthly maintenance from} RlsponOent \o.2,^{witfr an undertaking that she will not flle new application} for maintent nce^{with new allegations.}}

¶114

d. The Petitionlr agrees^{to withdraw the F.c.o.P No.llQ of 2018 on the file} of Hon'ble J rdge: Family Courts,^{City Civil Court Comple:xat Secunderabad} filed by her seeking dissolution of marriage^{and unconditionally with an} undertaking to take Divorce by Khula. The^{Petitioner also agreed to waive} off claimin ;^permanent alimony and monthly^{maintenance from} Respondent No.2,

¶115

e, The Petitior er and Respondents No.2 & 3^jointly moving^compromise application r FCOP No.491 of 20t7 on the file of Hon'ble Judge: Family Courts, City Civil Court Complex at Secunderabad stating that the custody of minor f :male child namely Tamkanant Eeman :;hall remain with Respondent No.2&3 permanently forever. The Petitioner will however have visiting righ s for two days during festivals i.e., Bakrirj and Ramzan. If minor girl T rmkanant Eeman willing to go with mother for two days. The Petitioner si all make such request in writing seeking visil.ation rights.

¶116

f. The Respon tent No.2 agreed to withdraw O.S No.69 of 2018 on the file of III Senior Cr ril Judge, City Civil Court Complex, Secunderabad filed against the Petition< r seeking damages.

¶117

g. The Respon lent No.3 agreed to withdraw o.S No.122 of 2018 on the file of )OO/II Adr itional chief Judge, city civil court comple>< at secunderabad filed against Petitioner seeking damages.

¶118

h. Thjs Comprc mise puts an end to all the litigation] between the pafties and

¶119

1. - The neither Petitioner of pr rties I ave no claim for any other against Respondent No.2 claims eithei civil br criminal to + .iin.i in future.^., iirit o|.

¶120

criminal and th, :^petitioner received back all her belongings from Mohammed omar Faisal i.e, Respondent No.2/Accused No.1 and she agreed to waive off

¶121

to claiming per nanent alimony and monthly maintenance from Respondent

¶122

----:::**,[g J . No,2/Accused No.I Moham ed Omar Faisal. similarly, Respondent No.2 has als. fto claimagainst the tioner.

¶123

Hence fiis Joint Memo.

¶124

,$,[,,$', Y Petitioner/D efacto Complainant Respondent No.2/,Accused No. 1

¶125

Counser rMo",,,,on.,.

¶126

Place: Hyderabad.^d'

¶127

(

¶128

Respond ent No.3/Accused No.2 - \A^j . fild^"o C.4oo ",.Respondent No.4/Accused rvo.gU -- Counsel for the ent Nos. {

¶129

Date: 19-10-2021

Mohammed Omar Faisal, And 2 Others v. The State of Telangana, And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Omar Faisal, And 2 Others v. The State of Telangana, And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Regonda Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Mettupally Santosh Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and another

Md.Yousuf Kaleem Vs The State of Telangana

C.Revathi Vs P.Vittal Reddy

Mohammed Abdul Mujeeb Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd Shafeeq Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana