Dismissed

The State of Telangana v. Macherla Satyam

Telangana HC15 Dec 2021CRLP/2122/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition seeking cancellation of interim bail conditions (weekly appearance before SHO) granted by a lower court. It rejected the prosecution's argument that pending cases against the sponsor were valid grounds for cancellation.

What did the court decide?

Cancellation of bail granted to the Respondent No.2 is refused and the appeal is dismissed.

The State of Telangana Vs Macherla Satyam — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE^{FIFTEENTHDAYOF DECETVBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYONE}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SMTJUSTICELALITHAKANNEGANTI}

¶5

CRIMINAL PE TITION^{NO: 21 220F 2020}

¶6

Between:

¶7

TheStateofTelangana,throughthestationHouseofficer,GundalaP,S,,rep,by f ne Funlrc^{proseculor, High Courtfor the State of Telangana'}

¶8

...PETITIONER/^RESPONDENT

¶9

AND

¶10

' Macherla Satyam' Fy;.H.M.i-86, OunOiijVittag6^{S/o.Rajeeru,age} aio^{62 years,} trlahoat, Bhadradri Kothagudem^{Occ' CPI(lvll)NDParty-Organizer'} District.

¶11

Yadallapalli Viswanadham @^{Azad, S/o' Chinnapap aiah'.Age42 years' Occ'}

¶12

il;;rii[re. nyo. yaoaiiipati-i cumpu Vilage of Yellandu Mandal, Bhadradri K5thagudem District,^{TelanganaState.}

¶13

(Respondent No.1 is^{not necessary pqrty)}

¶14

...RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED^No'61

¶15

Petition under^{Section439(2) of cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances} Stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court maybe} pi.ri.J t"t. cancel the bail^{granted to the accusedvide Orders dt. 10.1 2020in} brt.tvl.p.No.4/2020^{in Cr.No.3-+/2019passed by V Additional District andSessions} Judge, Kothagudem^.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶17

Petition under Section^{482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the N.4emorandum of^{Groundsof criminal Petition,the High court mav-be pleased} to susp"no the^{orders dt. 10.1.2020passed by the V Additional Districtand} SesstonsJudge,KothagudeminCri.M.P,No.4/2020inCr'No.3412019,pending disposal of the^{criminai petition.}

¶18

ThiSPetitionComingonforhearing,uponperusingthel/emorandumof Grounds of criminal^{Petition and uponhearingthe argumentsof Sri Assistant} puBLtc PROSECUTOR (TG) ,Advocate for the Petitioner and^{the on behalfof the} Sri V.RAGHUNATH,^{Advocate for the RespondentNo.2'}

¶19

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶20

THE HON'BLE SMT,^{JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI}

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2l22^{of 2O2O}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

'l'his r:t'rrt-rtnal pctition is Iilcd seel(ing ctrnct:llation ol bail order dated 10.01.2020^{in Crl.M.P.No.4ol'2O2Oon the file ol the} V Additional District and^{SessionsJudge} ,^{Kothagudemin Crime} No.34 of 2019 of Gundala^{Police Station, whereby the Court} below directed the^{accused to attend before the S'H'O, PS} Gundala, on every Sunday^{between 8.00 a.m. and 5'00 p'm' till} filing of charge sheet^{or for a periodof two monthsfrom the date} of their release,^{whichever is earlier. The Courtbelorv further} clirected the accused^{to assistthe investigating agcncyto} conplctc the investigation.

¶24

2.Learn.dAssistantPubiit:l'rr-rscctitorlirrpetition(ri-Statd submits that the^{2"'rt'e sponcletlt htrs got crir-tlinal atntt:c:cdents} anri this aspect^{was not considered bv the Cottrt llclow r'vhilc} granting bail. He submits^{that2rrd respondentis complying rvith} the conditions^{imposed by the Court below' On a queryfrom} the Court, he submits^{that no crime was registeredagainstthe} 2"d respondent after^{his release in this case'}

¶25

Having heard^{the learnedAssistant Public Prosecutor'the} ground on which the^{prosecution has sought for cancellation of} bail is not tenable.^{Moreover,the 2rd respondenthas been} complying with^{the conditions imposedby the Courtbelow and} he has not involved in^{anv otlle. crime Just becaus(: solr-tc} cases are^pen<iing against^{the 2'r(r responrlent p, rvhich arc Drior}

¶26

¶27

to registration^{of the case' cannot be a ground to cancel the bail}

¶28

grantecl to^{the 2rnl resPondent}

¶29

-+. ltl vit:s o1 thc^{airottr' the critt-tttlal petitioll is tlrsnlisst'11'}

¶30

As il^{st'r1urlI,ail 1h(' pr:nriingl.,niscellllilt'rlLts applit.atitlt-ts}

¶31

shall^{st:rnri closed}

¶32

,TRUE^COPY//

¶33

SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR i-,

¶34

SECTION^OFFICER

¶35

To.'-",. Th" V Additional District and Sessions Judge' Kothagudem'

¶36

The Station^{no"" oiiit"tlC'"o"iu iorit" stition' Bhadradri Kothagudem}

¶37

a. ?,rlf,r'3'a.^{to Assistant Public Prosecutor'Highcourt for the state of Telangana'} at Hyderabad [OUTI

¶38

One CC^{to SRI' V nnCHUrunfH'Advocate IOPUC]}

¶39

Two^CDCopies

¶40

One Spare^CoPY

CDL ,TR J--'

HIGH^COURT

DATED:1^511212021

ORDER

CRLP.No.2'122^{of 2020}

¶46

-4-\ il E Si4
./.
+
0 4 ilil 202?

¶47

DISMISSiNG^{THECRIMINALPETITION-}

¶48

tY' {1v o,.\

The State of Telangana v. Macherla Satyam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Telangana v. Macherla Satyam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Sanghi Vs The State of Telangana

Chendati Rama Krishna Vs State of Telengana

Manchireddy Prashanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana And Another

Menga Shyamulu, Vs The State of Telangana

The State of Telangana Vs Yadallapalli Viswanadham , Azad

The State of Telangana Vs Yadailapalli Viswanadham , Azad