Allowed

M/s. Premier Tubes Limited (In Liqn.) v. No Respondent

Telangana HC9 Sept 2021COMPA/87/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In RMVY PGNPn Tubes Limited (in liq.), the Hon'ble Court accepted the Assistant Official Liquidator's application under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 to take half-yearly accounts and auditors' reports for specific periods on record.

What did the court decide?

The half-yearly accounts and the auditors' reports for the specified periods are taken on file and the application is ordered accordingly.

M/s. Premier Tubes Limited (In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent — Company and Corporate | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGA NA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR

¶6

CoMPANY APPLICATIoN No,87 oF 2021

¶7

IN R.C.c. No.1s OF 1999

¶8

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

¶9

tN rHE MATTER or rvys, pn#Pn TUBES LtMrrED ( tn Liqn.)

¶10

Between.

¶11

The Assistant officiar Liouidator, For the State of rerangana and the state of Andhra Pradesh. at Hyderabad.

¶12

APPLICANT

¶13

company Apprication Under Section 462 of the companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 306 and read with Rule 298 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 19S9 praying that this Hon,bte Court may be pleased to

¶14

i. Take the half-yearly accounts for the period from (1) 01..10.2017 to 31 03.201B a long with Auditors, Report dated 08.0b.2019; (2)

¶15

01 04.201 B to 30.09.2018 atong with Audrtors' Report dated

¶16

08 05 2019; (3) o1 10 20jB to 31.03.2019 arong with Auditors, Report dated 08.05.20'19 by M/s. Dutt & Associates, chartered Accountants; (4) 01 .04.2019 to 30.09.2019 along with Auditors, Report dated 04.09.2020 and (5) 01.10.2019 to 31.03.2020 atong witr Auditors, Report dated 04.09.2020 by M/s. padmanabha Rao & Company, Chartered Accountants on record;

¶17

lt. Order that the cost of this application and any miscellaneous expenses do come out of the funds of the company or Estate and Establishment Fund if funds are not available in company.

¶18

This Company Application coming on for orders upon reading the Company Application and the affidavit dated 28-06-2021 filed by Sri Suresh Dharavath, Asst. Official Liquidator in support of the Company Application and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. J. Srinaclh Reddy, learned counsel for the Official Liquidator for the Applicant.

¶19

The Court made the following oRDER :

¶20

'.L

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICE T' VINODKUMAR}

¶23

coM^{PANYAPPLI CATIONNo.870f2021}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This^{Company Application is filed by the AssistantOfficial} Liquidator^{under Section 462of the CompaniesAct' '1956 readwith Rule} 306 of^{the Company(Court) Rules' 1959 to take on recordthe half-} yearly accounts^{along with the auditors'reports of ti//s Dutt &} Associates^{and M/s PadmanabhaRao & Company'Chartered} Accountants^{of the companyin liquldation'}

¶26

Perused^{the Auditors' Reports with theassistanceof Sri J Srinadh} Reddy,^{learned counsel for the Official Liquidator' The prayerls} accepted.^{The half-yearly accounts and the auditors' reports are taken} on file

¶27

This ComPanY^{APPlicationis ordered accordinglY'}

¶28

¶29

SdIIVI.SANTHI^VARDHANI JOINT REGISTRAR &

¶30

,TRUE COPY//

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

To 1. The official^{Liquidator, M/s. Premier TubesLimited(in Llqn.), High court at} ,

¶33

' ivO"-rJn"O, toi tt'," Stitu offelangana. Office at 1't Floor, Corporate Bhawan, itil""i" eii d-rrouOa, f6aiiiannai-urViffrg",^{Hayathnagar tr/andal, Ranga Reddy} Disirict Telangana^{State PinCode-500 680'}

¶34

2 The Reoistrar of Companiei,^{ttlin,ttr.Vof Corporate AffairsGovernmentof lndia'} ' iitrlJi'cfipoiui" eiii*jn, Nagole, Bandlaguda, Thattialnaram Village' . - - -nrurifiriroir-H,ranoar, nJnsi Re"ddy District Telangana state Pin code-500 680.

¶35

S. Th6^{Regio:nalDirector. South Eastern Region, Mrnistry ot (jorpo.rale Analrs' r -} -

¶36

- ii;;;, -C%;poiat" ehrwrn, Nagole, Bandlaguda,.Thattiannaram Villagg' -- f-f"raif,nl,ia1. Mandat,^{Rjnga heOdy Distriat,Telangana SlatePinCode-500 680.}

¶37

4 i# s;;il; otricei, bs^{Sdction, High court of Judicature at Hyderabad, for the} State of Telangana^{and the State of A.P.}

¶38

s. on6-c-C io Sri"J.Srinadh^{Reddy, officiatLiquidator, High court at Hyderabad} (oPUC)

¶39

Two CD CoPies

¶40

One Spare CoPY

lj) ri,l/

HIGH^COURT

DATED:09/09/2021

ORDER

COMPA.No.87 ol 202'l IN RCC NO.15 0F 1999

¶47

Y{ S TAi4: ,'{,i
a
,J
'..t- 21 SEP20?| f,;
,.i. tI {
i1 .,/
;o

¶48

ORDERING THE CA

¶49

p(
P(
Y

M/s. Premier Tubes Limited (In Liqn.) v. No Respondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Premier Tubes Limited (In Liqn.) v. No Respondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Sai Datta Constructions Vs The Public Information Officer

M/s Secure Parking Yard Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Leafin India Limited (In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent

M/s. Sai Priyadarshini Estates Pvt. Limited (In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent

M/s. Raksha Plantations Pvt. Ltd. (in liqn.) Vs No Respondent

M/s. Kohinoor Cements Limited (In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent