Dismissed

M/s. Maheshwari Megaventures Ltd., v. M/s. Krishnarama Industrial Investment Limited

Telangana HC1 Jul 2021CMA/283/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal withdraw nonlissequently by the appellant, granting liberty to file a counter-affidavit and directing the lower court to hear both sides within thirty days.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file counter-affidavit; stay of disposal on appeal; lower court to decide pending IA within 30 days.

M/s. Maheshwari Megaventures Ltd., Vs M/s… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶7

CIVIL MISCELLANE OUS APPEAL NO: 283 OF 2021

¶8

Appeal Under order XLilr Rure 1 (r) of the cpc 1908 against the Judgment/Decree in l.A.No.4s6 ol 2o2i in o.S.No.176 of 2021 dated .t 7.06.2021 on the file of the court of the XXVI Additional chief Judge, city civil court, Hyderabad.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Ylt-Iq*:l^yri^{MegaventuresLtd., representedby its managingdirector Sri Raj} lyAT^{ylL?ni S/o.tate Sri!gO{1slrprasadMatpdni ageda-borlt oa} veari, Oci busrness office at 3rd froor, 73, Marpani House g-2-608-/35 and 36, o'arii xnan Colony Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 34.

¶11

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.,t /DEFENDANT No.1

¶12

AND

¶13

l,4/s. Krishnarama lnduslrial lnvestment Limited, represented by its Director, Sri N Krishna lVlohan having its office at^,,Concrete House, 6_3'_O68ll O-OO. Durganagar Colony Punjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082

¶14

Sri N. Krishna Mohan, S/o. late Sri N. Sarvaiah. aged about Bl years, Occ business Rio.^"Concrete House' 6-3-66g/10-66, D-urganagar Co'lony punJagutta Hyderabad - 500 082.

¶15

Sri V.V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, S/o. late Sri V.S.N. Murthy, aged about 54 vears, Occ business R/o.^"Concrete House" 6-3-66g/.10-66, DLirga-nagar Colony'punjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082

¶16

Sri K ^Vijaya Kumar, S/g Sn K L Narayana, aged a bout 54 years, Occ business R/o. "Concrete House" 6-3-668/1 0-66,'DurganEgar Colony pLnjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS

¶18

It//s, K.M.c. constructions Ltd., represented by its Executive Director office at Plot No.555. Aurora Cotony, Road No.3, Banj-ara Hills, Hyderabad. Also at Door 1-80 40, SP/SB-65 Shitpa Homei Lay out, Gichibowli, Hyderabad - 500 031

¶19

Sri Rajamoban Reddy, S/o. late Sri M.Venku Reddy, aqed about 64 vears. Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No.5S5, Aurora Colony, Rijadtrto.S, Ban;ar6 Hills, Hyderabad

¶20

M/s. Sivashankar Real Estates, represented by its Managing partner Office at Plot No.739/4, Road No.37 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

¶21

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.2 to 4/DEFENDANTS NO.2 to 4

¶22

Counsel for the Appellant: SRt SHYAM S AGRAWAL

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI S. NTRANJAN REDDy FOR

¶24

M/s GORANTLA SRI RANGA PUJITHA

¶25

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶26

¶27

}IONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND

¶28

tloNOl-rll.Allt.E SRI JUSTICI T. VINOT) KLJMAR

¶29

(.I\ II, NIISCELLANEOIIS API' EAL \O.2tt3 0t:2021

¶30

., I]DGNII.]N^-t':

¶31

tPet Sri Justicr !1..t llurnclturlru llatt

¶32

Counsel fbr the appellant seeks ro withdraw this Appeal with liberty to file counter-affidavit in I.A.No.456 of Z02l in O.S.No.l76 of 2021 on the file of the XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and seeks a direction to the said court to decide the matter after hearing the appellant as weil as the respondents within thirty (30) days.

¶33

2, Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, leamed Senior Counsel for respondents I to 4 hrs no objection to this.

¶34

-l lrcrclbre. thc' Appeal is dismissed as wirhcrrarvn ivith riberrl, to the appellant to tlle counrer aftldavit in 1.A.No.456 of 2021 in ().S.N.. 176 ol'202 I belbrc the Courr bclow rvirhin one (ll w.eekrand rhe (.Lrrt bcl.rr is riilectcd ro decide the said l.A. alier hearing both siclc.s uithrn thirty (30) days ol filing of rhe counter_atlldavit by rhe respondents. No costs.

¶35

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Appeal shall also

¶36

stand dismissed.

¶37

Sd/- K.SRINIVASA^RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ q"

¶38

SECTION^OFFICER

¶39

To,

¶40

The XXVI^{Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court' Hyderabad'}

¶41

One CC to^{Sri Shyam S Agrawal, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶42

One CC^{to lV/s Gorantla Sri Ranga Pujitha' Advocate[OPUC]}

¶43

Two CD CoPies 5. One Spare^CoPY s br

¶44

HIGH COURT

¶45

DATED: 0110712021

¶46

1 tle s T4 r€
q
J
13 Lut2021
,t
!.) P 1

¶47

JUDGMENT

¶48

CMA.No.283 ot 2021

¶49

DISMISSING THE APPEAL

¶50

AS WITHDRAWN

¶51

I
\cLl

M/s. Maheshwari Megaventures Ltd., v. M/s. Krishnarama Industrial Investment Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Maheshwari Megaventures Ltd., v. M/s. Krishnarama Industrial Investment Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Jain Pet / Darshan Sipani Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s. Vasavi Traders Vs Commercial Tax Officer and Another

M/s. Crescent Real Estates and Developers Vs M/s. Subha Gruha Projects (India) Private Limited and Another

Kotha Manikya Reddy Vs Sunil Ghanathe

M/s. Krishnaa Cotton Mills Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, And Another

Mudigonda Gurucharan Vs All Concerned