M Ramulu v. Prof. Bhattu Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment closes a contempt case filed by a retired employee against a university registrar. The court refused to decide on the denial of retirement benefits in these contempt proceedings, directing the aggrieved party to pursue the matter in a pending writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; matter kept open in the pending writ petition (W.P. No. 15370 of 2020).
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
v
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT GASE NO: 44O OF 2020
(Contempt Case Under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to Punish the respondents for deliberate violation and willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 0910612017 in W.P. No. 131 16 of 201 1)
Betwee n:
It4 Ramulu,S/o. Late M.tr/allaiah, Junior Assistant (Retd), R/o H.No.2-3-512l'134l1/8, Bapunagar, Amberpet Hyderabad 50001 3
...PETTTTONER(S)
AND
Prof. Bhattu Ramesh, Registrar, Potti Sri Ramulu Telugu University, Public Gardens, Nampalli Hyderabad-500004
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the issue of denial of retirement benefits should be decided in contempt proceedings arising from pay revision orders.
Whether the High Court can go into the validity of the University's action regarding retirement benefits in this specific contempt case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
It4 Ramulu
- respondent
Prof. Bhattu Ramesh
Coram
P. Naveen Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/440/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court