Disposed

Smt. G. Nagarani v. State of Telangana, And 4 Others

Telangana HC6 Mar 2020WP/3636/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a school assistant, challenged her transfer alleging hardship in caring for her daughter. The court did not decide the merits but disposed of the petition by granting liberty to seek a representation for transfer to one of three available places and to avail leave without pay pending the decision.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to make a representation for transfer posting; leave without pay granted pending decision.

Smt. G. Nagarani Vs State of Telangana, And 4 Others — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.3636 OF 2020

¶3

Dated:06.03.2020

¶4

Between:

¶5

Smt. G. Nagarani .. Petitioner And State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶6

This Court made the following:

¶7

¶8

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.3636 OF 2020

¶9

ORDER :

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for School Education for the respondents.

¶11

Petitioner is working as School Assistant (Social) in ZPHS, Maryala Village, B. Ramaram Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. By order dated 31.01.2020, petitioner was transferred to ZPHS, Gattusingaram, Addagudur Mandal, Bhongir District. The transfer order refers to some alleged instances in the school compelling the District Education Officer to transfer the petitioner even though she has just completed two years of service. Petitioner alleges that she is residing in Secunderabad; she has to look after her daughter who is studying in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Tirumalagiri, Secunderabad; her husband is working as Associate Professor at Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak, Madya Pradesh and therefore the order of transfer is challenged on the ground that it would cause lot of hardship and suffering to her.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present transfer is to a far of place and it would cause lot of hardship and suffering to the petitioner as there is no other person to look after her daughter. He further submits that there are three places where vacancies are available and petitioner intends to make a representation requesting the District Educational Officer for considering the modification of the transfer order and posting to a place in any of these three places.

¶13

¶14

Without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation seeking modification of the transfer order to the District Educational Officer within three days from today and on due consideration of the request of the petitioner for posting her in any other three places, as requested by her, a decision shall be taken within two weeks thereafter. Till a decision is made, the petitioner can avail leave without pay. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶15

____________________
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date:06.03.2020
KH

Smt. G. Nagarani v. State of Telangana, And 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. G. Nagarani v. State of Telangana, And 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gownicadi Venkateswar Vs Tsrtc and 5 others

Kummari Krishna Murthy Vs The Telangana State Public Service Commission (Tspsc)

The Depot Manager Vs S.Ramesh

V.Ravinder, Vs Sri Sk. Singh, Ias.

Dabbagatla Padmavathi Vs Direct of Public Health and Family Welfare Dept and 2 others

M.a.Chand Pasha Vs The State of Telangana