This application complained of the freezing of a firm's bank account and obstruction of business. The authorities denied the allegations. The court recorded submission denying the freeze but allowed pending investigation and disposed of the petition.
Writ petition disposed; pending investigations allowed to proceed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR
WRI T PETI TI ON No.3453 of 2020
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents 5 and 6 in freezing the bank account of the first petitioner-firm maintained with Union Bank of India, Kandikal Gate Branch bearing A/c.No.327601010220048 (Current Account) and in preventing the second petitioner from peaceful running of business with respect to manufacturing, packing, sales and distribution of business products into the market, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
2
the respondent authorities never interfered in the business of the second petitioner.
miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final
order. No order as to costs.
_____________________
JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR
Date:19.02.2020
grk
Note:
Furnish CC
in two days.
b/o grk
First Petitioner (Firm)
Second Petitioner
Home
T.Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
