High Court disposed of a writ petition and miscellaneous petition challenging the Director of Agriculture's interference with bio-products manufacturing under the Insecticides and Fertilizers Control Acts, referencing prior orders.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; disposal based on prior orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ,AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 22208 OF 20 20
Between:
M/s. Sri Sudarshana Fertilizers, Rep. by its Partner, L. Venkat Narsimhulu, S/o. L. Hanumaiah, aged 45 years, Fl/o. D.No. 27, Muddaipet Village, Yatal Mandal, Pagidyal Post, Vikarabad District, Telangana State - 501 144. F actory at . Sy.No. 99144, J?nagam_ Village, Peddemul Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana State - 501 142. Office at . D.No. 3-2-199, Venkateshwara Colony, Tandur Mahdal, Vikarabad District - 501'141 ,Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in interfering with manufacturing, sale and distribution of bio-products of petitioner-Firm, viz., Hairtha Gromin, by issuing Memo No. PP.ll(1)208512005, dated 2110112006 and Letter No. PP.ll(1 )2085/2005, dated 2110112006 as being illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutional and further direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with in any manner in manufacturing, sale and distribution of bio-products including from the licensed premises of the dea lers/stockists under the lnsecticides Act, 1968 and the Fertilizers Control (Order) Act, 1985.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with manufacturing, sale and distribution of bio-products of petitioner-Firm, viz., Hairtha Gromin, including from the licensed premises of the dealers, stockists, under the lnsecticides Act,'1968 and the Fertilizers Control (order) Act, 1985,pending disposal of the above Writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. B. V. APARNA LAKSHMI
Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR
The court made the following: oRDER
GP FoR AGRICULTURE
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WP No.22208 of 2O2O
ORDER::
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents.
SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANTREGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
Secretariat,HYderabad. 2. The Commissioneraii Director of Agriculture'State of TelanganaOpp L'B' ' ii;;i,i;, Br.hJeioagh, Hvderabad, Telansana State'
;. i;; dc.l"-ciior agi[,rtJre,Hish court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
SM
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:0811212020
tl s I A i
o,(
k
J
oo 1 1 DEC 2U0 o
* *
ORDER
WP.No,22208 ot 2020
DISPOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
)o-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
common order passed by this CourtReferred¶25
W.P.No.25293 of 2014 and batch, dated 10.07.2015
Division BenchReferred¶25
W.A.Nos.1122 and 1136 of 2016
M/s. Sri Sudarshana Fertilizers, Rep. by its Partner, L. Venkat Narsimhulu
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation Dept.
The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, State of Telangana
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
