Dismissed

S. Kishore Kumar, v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies/

Telangana HC2 Mar 2020WP/19742/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of an impugned order. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause of action no longer survives and has become infructuous. The High Court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition. The order is a brief procedural disposition with no substantive discussion.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

S. Kishore Kumar, Vs The Registrar of Cooperative… — Cooperative Societies | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original u risdiction)

¶2

¶3

IVONDAY, THE SECON; DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 19742 OF 2010

¶7

Between:

¶8

S. Kishore Kumar, S/o. S. Srinivasa Rao, Retired Employee, Rl/o. Plot No. 11'12, Near Krishna Temple, Bhagatsingh Nagar, Phase-ll, Kukatpally, Hydegbad.

¶9

,..PETITIONER/5' " RESPONDENT

¶10

AND

¶11

The Registrar of Cooperative Societies/ Revision Authority, Office at Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies,, Divisional Cooperative Officer, Hyderabad (West), Division, R.R. District at Hyderabad.

¶13

Asst. Registrar/PIC Designate,, IDPL Workers Cooperative Housing Society Limited, O/o. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Divisional Cooperative Officer, Hyderabad (West), Division, R.R. District, at Hyderabad.

¶14

IDPL Workers Cooperalive Housing Society Ltd.,, Rep. by the PIC Designate, Bhagathsinghnagar, Hyderabad-85.

¶15

Ir/. Venakatesham,, S/o. I\il. Laxmaiah, R/o. Plot NO.586, Bhagathsingh Nagar-|, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-85.

¶16

1. P. Ram N,4ohan Rao,, S/o. P. Jayaramdas, Fl/o. B-35, Raju Colony, Balanagar, HAL Post, Hyderabad-42

¶17

1. V.V. Rama Krishna Raju,, Sio. V. Bhagawan Raju, R/o. Flat 303, HIG 233 S.K. Towers,5th Phase, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad-72.

¶18

1. M. Harish,, S/o. Late lr/. Ranga Raol, R:/o. Plot NO. 1103, Bhagatsingh Nagar-ll, Hydernagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-85.

¶19

o P. Venkateswara Rao,, S/o. Late P. Krishna Rao, Fl/o.6-1-68, Balanagar, HAL Post, Hyderabad-42.

¶20

10 M. Chandra Reddy,, S/o. l,4. Ram Reddy, R/o. H.No. C-l33, IDPL Colony, Bala Nagar, Township, Hyderabad-37

¶21

11 P. Chandramanikyam, S/o. P. Lingaiah, Fl/o. H.No.5-64, Dullapally, Village and Post'Via Hakimpet'secunderabad-'l4

¶22

...REspoNDENTS/REVrsroN'ETTT.NERS

¶23

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction one in the nature of "Writ of Certiorari" by quashing the impugned order in R.P.No.1 o'f 2010 dl. 24-07-2010 passed by the lst respondent as illegal and arbitrary, and violative of Section 32 (1) (1-A) of the A.P. CS Act, and Rule 23 (2) of ACPS Rules,^'l 1964, consequentially to restore the order of the 2nd respondent passed in proceeding No. Rc.No.7B7l09-E dt. 16-01-2010 by calling for the records, in the interest of justice.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI UNNAM MURALIDHAR RAO

¶25

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR COOPERATION

¶26

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7, 9 to 11: SRI K. CHIDAMBARAM

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

FI()N'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SH,\VII.I

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.1 9742 of 201 0

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Leorned counsel oppeoring for the petilioner s rbnrils thot ihe

¶32

couse in lhe writ petition does not survive for odjudi<:otirrn ond hos

¶33

become inf ructLrous

¶34

Recording the soid submission, lhe writ petition is cismissed os

¶35

infructuous. No order os to costs.

¶36

Pending nriscelloneous petilions, if ony, sholl sto 1d^(:losed.

¶37

S,lr- T RAN BABU AtistsiT TRAR

//TRUE COPY//

CTION OFFICER

One CC to Sri Unnam Muralidhar Rao Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri K Chidambaram Advocate [OPUC] J. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court^{for the State of --elangana (OUT)} 4. Two CD Copies

t\4BC

AKS,J

I{IGH COURT

DA]'Ell: 0210312020

g SiA 16
't t{
J
It I IPR ,.JL
<br>.. ",.r -l
: i: ,-, : a,
''i.-:...-:,*

¶48

ORDER

¶49

WP.N ).19742 of 2010

¶50

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS

¶51

INFRUCTUOUS, Wl TI{OUT COSTS

¶52

5P5(,v,,,

S. Kishore Kumar, v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Kishore Kumar, v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Ankushavali Vs Sri N. Sridhar

Sangepu Ramakrishna Vs Shri V.V. Srinivas Rao

Beeram Narsaiah Vs Sri N. Sridhar, And 2 Others

Kambhampati Prabhanjan Rao Vs Bodda suresh Kumar

Sri S.Vijaya Kumar Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Eluri Koteswara Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others