Dismissed

Mangali Shivakumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Jan 2020WP/1360/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition challenging the seizure of petitioners' tractors and trailers for alleged illegal sand transportation. The court directed the petitioners to seek release of vehicles from the jurisdictional Magistrate or the 2nd respondent citing relevant policy guidelines and concluded without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to approach Magistrate or 2nd respondent for vehicle release within three days.

Mangali Shivakumar Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.1360 of 2020

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

This writ petition is filed praying to direct the respondents to release the Tractor and Trailers bearing Nos TS07FB0363 and TS34T1077, TS07ED6335 and TS07UA1737 of petitioners respectively, which were allegedly seized by the 2^nd respondent on the allegation of illegal transportation of sand.

¶5

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that in similar circumstances, this Court disposed of WP.No.13559 of 2019, dated 04-07-2019. The same is not disputed by learned Assistant Government Pleaders for respondents.

¶6

In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶7

The petitioners are at liberty to approach either the learned Jurisdictional Magistrate before whom the vehicles may have been produced and file applications as per the procedure established by law and seek release of the vehicles by brining to the notice of the Court the policy decision taken by the Government and the terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, Industries and Commerce (Mines-I) Department, dated 19-022015, if the petitioners so desire; or in the alternative they may make a request to the 2^nd respondent by filing

¶8

¶9

appropriate applications for release of vehicles, if not already filed and not received by the 2^nd respondent ; and if any such applications are filed before the 2^nd respondent, the 2^nd respondent is at liberty to pass appropriate orders as per terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 19-02-2015, after examining the competence and jurisdiction to release the vehicles, if the same were produced before the Court concerned. It is needless to state that the applications, if any, filed by the petitioners before either the Court or the 2^nd respondent, shall be disposed of within three days from the date of filing in the interest of justice. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶10

____________________________
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
23-01-2020
Nvl

¶11

¶12

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶13

ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.84 of 2019

¶14

02-01-2020 Nvl

Mangali Shivakumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangali Shivakumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ch. Sudhakar Raju, Vs Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.

T.Krishna Yadav Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Godasu Kistaiah , Krishna Vs the State of Telangana

Shri. Arun Kumar Hameelpur Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Mohd. Abdul Basit, And 5 Others Vs The Government of Telangana, And 3 Others

Mohd. Ghouse Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others