Dismissed

Sri. Palakurthy Srinivas v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC6 Oct 2020WP/12537/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP No.12537 of 2020 regarding Fair Price Shop authorization, the Telangana High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the counsel's submission and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Sri. Palakurthy Srinivas Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶6

Between:

¶7

WRIT PETITI ON NO: 1 2537 0F 2020

¶8

sri Pa.lakurthy.S^rinrv1s, s/o Late Brhamarah, Aged about 49 years. occ. Dealer of F.p. thop^{No. 2416007, Penchikalpet Viltage,R/o-H. No. 1-65,-yelkapaily.penchikatpet} l,4andal, Kumrambheem-Asifabad, (erstwhile Adilabad) District.

¶9

...PET|T|ONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'l . The State-of Telangana, Rep., its Commissioner of Civil Supplies Department and Ex-officio S-egle_talyr 3'o Floor, Civil Supplies Bhavan, Somajigud'a, Hyderabad- 500 082. TS.

¶12

The Collector (Civil Supplies), Kumrambheem-Asifabad, At Kumrambheem-

¶13

Asifabad (erstwhile-Adilabad), District-504 001. TS.

¶14

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Asifabad Division, at Asifabad Town, Kumrambheem-Asifabad (Erstwhile Adilabad) District-504 292. TS.

¶15

The Tahsildar, Penchikalpet I/andal, At Penchikalpet, Kumrambheem-Asifabad

¶16

(Erstwhile Adilabad) District-S04 299. TS.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the in action of 2nd Respondent in issuing the Order in Case No. Cl12812019, dated 1 6.07.201 9 and not renewing the Authorization by saying that the Petitioner is running the Fair Price Shop No. 2416007 beyond 3'1l03/2015, by alleging the Petitioner neither approached the competent authority besides not supplying of Commodities for distributing to the card holders, as illegal, arbitrary and in Violation of Principals of Natural Justice and Consequently drrect the Respondent to renew the authorization of FP. Shop No. 2416007 for supply the commodities by suspending the impugned Orders in Case No. Ct 128t2019, dated 16107t2019 passed by the 2"d Respondent pending disposal of the writ petition

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the Respondent to renew the authorization of FP. Shop No, 2416007 for supply the commodilies by suspending the impugned Orders in Case No. C112812019, daled 16.07.2019 passed by the 2no Respondent^pending disposal of the writ^petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI GONE RAMESH

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR^{CIVIL SUPPLIES}

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 &^{4 :} GP^{FOR REVENUE}

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

TIIE IIOYBT-[_ SRI,Jt STtCI: .{.1{.{.tASIII._KElt lu.-Dt)\

¶26

WP No.12537 of 2020

¶27

ORI) E R

¶28

Sri Cone Ramesh. learned counsel lor the petitioner seeks permission to

¶29

ri,ithdraw this writ petition on the ground that cause in the writ petition does not

¶30

surr i,''e fbr consideration and no further orders are necessarv.

¶31

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶32

pemrission is hereby accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrarvr.r.

¶33

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this case are also dismissed. There shall

¶34

be no order as to costs-

SD/-I.NAGALAKSHM I

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

l" SECTION OFFICER

1 . One CC to Sri Gone Ramesh, Advocate IOPUC]

¶41

fwo CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶42

Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (our)

¶43

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:061'1012020

1 H E S rA r4:
(
i oo 13 0CT2m
o
<br>l
t
DF ATc

¶48

ORDER

¶49

WP.No.12537^{of 2020}

¶50

DTSMISSING THE WRIT^PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT^COSTS.

¶51

-X
<\F

Sri. Palakurthy Srinivas v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Palakurthy Srinivas v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Omega Elevators Vs Union of India and 2 Others

G. Madhusudhan Yadav and Another Vs Jythuwada Mallaiah and 28 Others

Dr.Nagabhushana Rao Vs Putta Anjaneyulu goud

M/s. SandS Green Projects Private Limited Vs P.Srinivasa Rao

P. Bala Mallesh Vs Smt. Sujatha Raji Reddy

Anumula Krishna Vs The State of Telangana