Disposed

M/s. Kiezen Crop Science v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Aug 2020WP/12183/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court for Telangana issued a common order closing three writ petitions filed by bio-product manufacturers. The petitions challenged interference with their products, alleging violation of Insecticides and Fertilizers Acts. The Court noted a previous order mandating implementation of a government memo and closed the present petitions accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions WP Nos 12033, 12183, and 12223 of 2020 and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed with no separate order passed.

M/s. Kiezen Crop Science Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶5

WRIT PETITION NOS: 12033, 12183 & 12223 OF 2020

¶6

WP No: 12033 of 2020

¶7

Betwee n;

¶8

[,4/s Ramara Organics, R/o Plot No.'17 and 18, N/lalowel Colony, Hemanagar, Boduppal, l,4edipally lVandal. lVledchal-lr/alkajgiri District. Rep., by its Partner Smt.Yedlapalli Anjamma

¶9

..,PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary,^{(Agriculture),} Secretariat, Secratariate Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying thatⁱⁿ the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleased to issue an order or direction or Writ more^particularly one in the nature of^{Writ of} N,4andamus declaring the action of the respondent in interferlng with the manufacturing, sale and supply of Bio Products like like 1.Patas, 2 Power,^{3 Planet,} 4 Bounce,5, Flame,6 Focus, T Force, S Fortuner, 9 Solar, 10 Grace, 11,^Honest, 12, Proud, 13, Restore, 14 IVliracle, 15 Trust, 16 Vital, 17, Victory,^{1B Power Up, 19} Leader, 20, Target, 21 Potent, 22 Sharp, 23 Swank, 24^{Tip Top, 25 Trump26'} Radical, 27, Rudra, 28, lsam, 29 Gagan, 30 Spar, 31^Karna, 32^{Dharani, 33} Cracker, 34 Angular, 35 Cloud 36 Khajana, 37 Spark,^{38 Viswam, 39 Arman, 40} Srngam, 41 Omkar, 42 Nexa, 43 Puskar, 44^{Avalar,45,Rambo, 46, Winner,47} Ranger,48, Spider,49, Bali,50 Legend,51 Rapid,52 Ride,53^{High-5,54 l,4ithra55} Saradhi, 56 Keerthi, 57 Tata,58, Terminator, 59^{Kavacham,60 Jupiter,61 RRR,62} Super-6, 63 Hunter, 64 N4ajor, 65 Twister, 66 Pick Up,^{67 StarFlower, 68 Sipn} Flower, 69 Solider, 70 Sigma, 71 Pyramid, 72, Baclhra,^{T3 Pudami,74 Leo, 75 R-} 999, 76 ll|alrix,77 [r,/alik, 78 Dharbar, 79 Nanomer, 80^{KGF, B1 Avon,82, Arga,83} Hector, 84 Azo Green, 85 Rocket, 86, Punch, B7 Vasool,^{BB Rom-Ram,89Chetak,} 90 Wizard,91 Sudoko,92 Antrix,93, Virat,94 Jodi,95^{Jet,96 Vikrant,97Konark,} 98 Orbit, 99 Rider, 100 Sainik,l0l Jaitra, 102 Galaxy,^{103 Royal Flower,104 Scope,} 105 Jeevan, 106 Sriman, 107 Jagadam, 108 Agent,^{which are not covered under} the lnsecticides Act, 1968 and the Fertilizers Control^{(Orders) Act, '1985, whichplant} extract by issuing l,4emo No.PP.ll(1)208512005, dt.211112006^{and the consequential} letter No.PP.ll (1)l2OB5l2OO5, d1.2110112006 as^{illegal, arbitrary,unconstitutional} and without^jurisdiction and further direct the^{respondentsnot to interfere with in any} manner with the Bio^products of the^petitioner including^{from the licensedpremises} of its d ealers/stockists under the lnsecticides^{Act,'1968and the Fertilizers Control} (Order), Act^'1985.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court maybe pleased to direct} the respondents not to interfere with^{manufacture,sale and distribution of the} petitioner's Bio Products like Iike 1.Patas, 2 Power, 3 Planet,^{4 Bounce, 5, Flame, 6} Focus, T Force, 8 Fortuner, I Solar,^{10 Grace, 11, Honest, 12, Proud' 13, Restore,} 14 l,4iracle, 15 Trust, 16 Vital, 17,^{Victory,18 PowerUp, 19 Leader,20'fargel' 21}

¶17

--L

¶18

Potenl,22 Sharp, 23 Swank, 24 Tip Top,^{25 Trump26' Radical,27, Rudra,28'} Nam, 29 Gagan, 30 Spar, 31 Karna, 32^{Dharani, 33 Cracker, 34 Angular, 35 Cloud} 36 Khajana, 37 Spark,38 Viswam,^{39 Arman, 40 Singam,41Omkar,42 Nexa,43} Puskar, 44 Avalar,45, Rambo, 46,^{Winner,47 Ranger, 48, Spider,49, Bali,50} Legend, 51 Rapid, 52 Ride,53 High-5,54^{tr/lithra 55 Saradhi' 56 Keerthi'57 Tara,} 58, Terminator, 59 Kavacham, 60^{Jupiter, 61 RRR,62 Super-6,63 Hunter, 64} lVajor, 65 Twister, 66 Pick Up, 67 Star^{Flower,68 Sipn Flower' 69 Solider' 70} Sigma, 71 Pyramid, 72, Badhra,73^{Pudami,74 Leo,75R-999, 76 tt4atrix,77 Ir/alik,} 7&Dharbar, 79 Nanomer, 80 KGF,^{B'1 Avon, 82, Nga, 83 Hector, 84 Azo Green,85} Rocket, 86, Punch, 87 Vasool,^{BB Rom- Ram,89 Chetak,90 Wizard, 91 Sudoko,92} Antrix,93, Virat,94 Jodi,95 Jet,96^{Vikrant,gT Konark,98Orbit,99Rider, 100} Sainik,'101 Jaitra, 102 Galaxy,^{103 Royal Flower, 104 Scope, 105 Jeevan,106} Sriman, 107 Jagadam,^1OB Agent,^{which are not coveredunderthe lnsecticidesAct,} 1968 and the Fertilizers Control^(Orders) Act,^{1985 plant extract including the} licensed^premises of its^dea lcrs/stock^{iests under the lnsecticidesAct, 1968and the} Fertilizers Control^(Order) Act, 1985,^{pending disposalof the writ petition.}

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. G ESWARAIAH

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR^AGRICULTURE

¶21

WP No. 12183 of 2020

¶22

Between:

¶23

lV/s. KIEZEN CROP SCIENCE, Rep. by its Proprietor,^Sri. Ramana Devabhaktuni, S/o. Bapa Rao. Aged about 42^years, Occ.^Business,R/o Plot No.5-146, FATHE NAGAR, Near Bhagat Singat Singh Park, Hyderabad

¶24

..,PETITIONER

¶25

AND

¶26

1 State of Telangana, Rep. its Principal Secretary^{to Government, Agriculture} Department. Secretariat. Saidabad.^{H yd era bad.}

¶27

2 Commissioner and Director of Agriculture,^{Telangana, Gun Foundry,Hyderabad}

¶28

..RESPONDENTS

¶29

Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of^{lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Court may be pleased} to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more^{particularlyone in the natureof WRIT OF} IVANDAI\i US declaring the action of the respondents^{in interferingwith the} manufacturing, Distribution and sale of the^{petitioner's products of K-SP,K-ZEN,} KARISHAI\4A-SUPER, K-KOR, IMOVE STONG, EXIT,^{KIYRON,K-IVITE,DIAI\iAND.} SUPER STRONG, SPYDER PLUS,^{FINESH- SUPER PLUS,LOCKER-GOLD,} HYPPAR, DICLLER, K-LANDER, DELTON, PROTI-K,^{KVIRON,ORAKIL, POWER} GROW, SUPER POWER, JERSEY, RECOVER,^{KLARUS, RUMEX, as illegal'} arbitrary, u nco nstitutio nal and without^jurisdiction and^{further directthe respondents} not to interfere with in any manner in the manufacture,^{sale and distribution of the} petitioner's B io-products.

¶30

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶31

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{maybe pleased to direct} the respondents herein to allow the^petitioner to manufacture,^{saleand distribute} the Bio-products are K-SP, K-ZEN, KARISHAN/A-SUPER,^{K-KOR, A/OVE STONG,} EXIT, KIYRON, K-IVITE, DIAIVAND.SUPER STRONG,^{SPYDER PLUS,FINESH-} SUPER PLUS, LOCKER.GOLD, HYPPAR, DICLLER,^{K-LANDER,DELTON,} PROTI-K, KVIRON, ORAKIL, POWER GROW, SUPER^{POWER,JERSEY,} RECOVER, KLARUS, RUtVEX, including^{fromthe licensed premises of the dealers/} Stockists under the lnsecticides Act, 1968 and^{the Fertilizers Control (Order) Act} '1 985, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶32

¶33

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRI P' SIVANARAYANA}

¶34

Counsel for^{the Respondents:GP FORAGRICULTURE}

¶35

WP NO: 12223^{OF 2020}

¶36

Between:

¶37

lV/s. Ravi Agrichem,^ReP. o.'n.iio. z:I, bv its Proprietor,^{Nieiarjm, N. Ravinder Reddy,.S/g',N.'.PrathapHasanparthy-lvandal, warangal} Reddy, aged 50 Years,-^R/ District. FbctorY^andOffice it. H,rrc IrEz oi-n.5.'R;;^{nagiar'Hvderabad- 500 062'} Telangana State,

¶38

...PETITIONER

¶39

AND

¶40

1 The State of^{Telanqana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-} operation Dept.,secretariat,^Hyderabad'

¶41

2 The Commissioner^{and Director of Agriculture,S^tateof Telangana Opp. L'B'} Stadium, Basheerbagh,^{Hyderabad, TelanganaState'}

¶42

...RESPONDENTS

¶43

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased} to issue a Writ, Order^{or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of} N/andamus declaring^{the action of the 2nd Respondentin interfering with the} manufacturing, sale"anO^{supply of bio-product of petitioner-Firm,viz', R Fighter, R} spider, R ngni,^R Shakti,^{R Ravizyme,R Shooter, R Vazta, R Temper, R Cobra, R} D,ozer,R Salp, R^{Hunter,R tr/issiie, R Grower, R Booster, R Lancher, R Dragon,R} Power, R Prince, R^{Shadow and R Rocket by issuing[VlemoNo. PP.ll (1)208512005,} dated 21lot/2006^{and Letter No. PP.ll(1)2085/2005,dated 2110112005as being} illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional^{and withoutjurisdictionand further direct the 2nd} respondent not to^{interfere with in any manner in manufacturing, sale and} distribution of bio-products^{including from the licensed premises ofthe} dealers/stockists under^{the lnsecticidesAct, 1968 and the Fertilizers Control (Order)} Act, 1985.

¶44

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶45

petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^statedin the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the HighCourt may be pleased to direct} the 2rid respondent not^{to interferewith manufacturing, sale and distributionof bio-} products of petitioner-Firm , viz., R Fighter,^{R Spider,R Agni, R Shakti, R Ravizyme,} R Shooter, R Vazra, R- Temper,^{R Cobra, R Dozer,R Saap, R Hunter, R lVissile,R} Grower, R Booster, R Lancher,^{R Dragon, R Power, R Prince, R Shadow and R} Rocket under the lnsecticides Act,^{1968 and the FertilizersControl (order) Act'} 1985, pending disposal of the above^{Writ petition.}

¶46

Counset for the Petitioner: M/S. B V APARNA^LAKSHMI

¶47

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR^AGRICULTURE

¶48

The Court made the following:

¶49

¶50

THE HON' BLE SRI ]USTICE^{CHALLA KODANDARAM}

¶51

WRIT PETITIONS No.^{12033, 12183 AND 1?223 of 2020}

¶52

COMMON ORDER:

¶53

This Court, while disposing^{of WritPetitions No. 9801 of 2020and} batch, on 05.08.2020,^{duly recordingthe Memo dated 25.07.2020 issued by} the Commissioner,^{made it clearthat it shall be the responsibilityof the} Commissioner as well^{as the State to ensure the said Memo is implementedin its}

¶54

letter and sPirit,

¶55

In view of the said^{order, no separateorder is required to be passedrn}

¶56

these Writ Petitions^{and accordingly,the sameare closed'}

¶57

Miscellaneous^{petitions,if any pending, shall stand closed}

¶58

SD/.K.MURALI

¶59

ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Lw''

¶60

SECTION^OFFICER

¶61

To,

¶62

One^{CC to Sri. G. Eswaraiah, Advocate(OPUC)} ^' ). o;;^{aa io Sri. P. Sivanarayanq' Advocate(oPUg].} 3. one cc^{to lvlis. BJ'Ap;;'Lir.rr.'ri, Advocate(oPUC)} 4. Two CCs^{to GP for Agriculture, 'tl'igfl'il,.i ior the' State of Telangana at} Hyderabad^(OUT)

¶63

Two^{CD CoPies.}

HIGH COURT

DATED:07/08 12020

COMMON ORDER

1 tr€ ) IA 7e'
Y
'J
oo 2 t AUB2Un
*
t
) PNtcH

¶69

WP.No.12033, 12183 & 12223 of 2020

¶70

Closing the WPs.

M/s. Kiezen Crop Science v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Kiezen Crop Science v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Vijay Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Bantu Ram Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Ruhaina Apartments Owners Welfare Society and 5 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Jonna Raji Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Kanchu Naresh Vs The State of Telangana

A.Ranga Reddy Vs the State of Tg