Sri Bayya Sitaram v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.10913 OF 2019…
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.10913 OF 2019…
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
W.P.No.10913 OF 2019
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the term of the Managing Committee has expired on 15.6.2019 and the Person-In-Charge has been appointed, the cause in this writ
petition does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
________________________________
JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Date: 21.1.2020
rkk
Petitioner
Respondent
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court