The High Court disposed of a criminal revision petition by dismissing it as infructuous. The matter was considered by the Court on a petition filed by the State, and the revision was found to have no substantive purpose remaining.
Criminal Revision Case CRL.RC.No.992 of 2014 was dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THURSDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF il/IARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 992 OF 2014
Criminal Revrsion case Under Section 397 & 40'1 of Crl.P.C against the Judgment in Crl.A.No.16012014 dt.24-4-2014 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Court, R.R.District, preferred against the Order in Crl.M.P. 25522 of 2013 in DVC No.35/2013 dt 31 .1 .2014 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court cum Xl Metropolitan Ivlagistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar.
Between:
K.Venkata Srinath, S/o K. Harinarayana
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
,,.RESPONDENTS
CRL.RC.MP. NO: 1570 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in DVC No.35/2013 on the file of the Hon'ble Special Mobile Court cum Xl lvletropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar Hyderabad.
CRL.RC.MP. NO: 2141 OF 2014
Betwee n:
Smt.B.Purna Praneetha, Rl/o 8-10'1 , Road No.2 Gowthamnagar Pand T Colony Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO. 2
AND
...,RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.,I
Petition under llection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in th€ cirr:ums12n""r r,r,"O in the Memorandum,:f Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, t re l-ligh Court may be pleased to vacate ihe interim direction granted in Crl. ROIt/F'. N o.157012014 in Crl. RC. No.992 1201 4'ialed 29.04.201 4 This petition(,r)ming on for hearing, upon perusing the lt4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case and upon hearing tl- e .rrguments of Sri. KRISHNA MURTHY I.iEVARAKONDA, Advocate for the petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf rl Respondent No. 1 and of Sri. K. CHIDAIVIIARA[,4, Advocate for the"Respondent l lr. 2.
The Court made the l:rllowing:
IIO\OURABI,E SIiI JLS I I(-[- CHALL.,\ KOD,{\DA R,.)I
CRL.R.C.No.992 of 20ll
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject
Inatter in the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Cqiminal Revision Case is dismissed as
infiuctuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending in the Writpetition, il any.
shall stand closed.
Sd/. C.V.MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
/iTRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PIV
HIGH COURT
DATE D : 0 5 I 03l',.'.1)20
ORDER
CRL.RC.No.99ll of 2014
1 F € St4 r4r
(
)1c:
<br>iJ I I iijit 20)0 Ic.
4'
, oE..9t..'Tc!r <i) Ji
i.*
Dismissing the Crl.RC As infructuous No costs.
I
) t ) /-,L-'
L,,-"
ci
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition should be dismissed as infructuous.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Venkata Srinath
The State of AP.
Smt.B.Purna Praneetha
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
