Dismissed

Thonda Ravi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Mar 2020CRLP/716/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C sought quashing of an FIR. The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the State submitted that the investigation was completed with a final report citing lack of evidence, leaving no matter for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous, and pending miscellaneous petitions were stood closed.

Thonda Ravi Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 716 OF 20'tg

¶7

Between:

¶8

Thonda Ravi, S/o. Shekaiah

¶9

...PETITIONER/ ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana

¶12

Obulu Nagabhushana Reddy, S/o. Obulu Venkat Rama Reddy

¶13

.......Respondent

¶14

...RESPONDENTS/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records, relating to the F.l.R.No.20l2O19 dated 2410112019 of P.S. Ir/oinabad, Cyberabad and quash the same.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in F.1.R.No.2012019 dt.24-01-2019 of P.S. Moinabad, Cyberabad, including the arrest of the petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the [/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MUDDU VlJAl, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 and of Sri E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2,

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.716 OF 2OI9

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

When the matter has come up, learned Additional on Public Prosecutor, representing the State, instructions, submits that the police after completion of investigation referred the case as 'Lack of Evidence' and filed final report before the concerned Court and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this case.

¶24

Recording the said submission, the Criminal

¶25

Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous

¶26

petitions, if any pending shall stand closed

¶27

Sd/-CH.VENKATES RLU ASSISTANT R RAR

//TRUE COPYII

SECT FFICER

1 The Il Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- XVI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶32

The Station House Officer, PS, Ii/oinabad, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District .) J. Two ccs to the Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. One cc to Sri Muddu Vijai, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies

¶33

One cc to Sri E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, Advocate (OPUC) Kj

HIGH COURT

DATED:03/03/2020

1 $E sr4 16
t )
?
oo 2 { APn 2320
.\oz
8/t
-h.
'er!

¶38

ORDER

¶39

CRLP.No.716 of 2019

¶40

DISMISSING THE CRL,P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶41

! I
1/
yt

Thonda Ravi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thonda Ravi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Raghu babu Vs The state of Telangana

Ajith Nair, Warangal., Vs State of Ap., Rep Pp and 3 Otrs.

Anchoori Rekha Vs Smt.Mahankali Sravanthi

Md. Vajeed , Wajeed Vs The State of Telangana

Kothamsau Venkata Ram Kiran Vs State of Telagana

Eidupugati Venkata Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana