Disposed

Mohammed Aleem Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Dec 2020CRLP/5361/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court instead of releasing a directly the allegedly illegally seized two-wheelers directed petitioners to approach the judicial First Class Magistrate Kodangal for release by filing an application, after which the Magistrate will consider merits.

What did the court decide?

Ordered the petitioners to apply to the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kodangal, for release of seized two-wheelers.

Mohammed Aleem Pasha Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR Ar HYJ#lBltrE^{oF TELANGANA}

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE NII, rwo ixousnilliRAt ffIRECEMBER

¶3

rHE HoNouRor.. S[,tiTrLE r.vrNoD KUMAR

¶4

Between:

¶5

CRIMI NALPE TITION NO:5 361 OF 2020

¶6

Mohammed Aleem pasha, S/o Mohammed Hussaian

¶7

K.Rajugopal Goud. K.Venkrtrrrnrfu Corj

¶8

...PETITIONERYACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

' Il:"?:fl:r"f relangana' Rep its Public Prosecutor, Hish court of reransana at

¶11

2 Sri l'4ohammed Naser. Station House officer, Marikar porice station, tvlarikar Narayanpet District.

¶12

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Ground s of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to declaring the actron of res qo-ndeirt No.2 in seizing the petitioners vechicle i.e, GLAMOUR DRUM AP-22-AL-2 1Bl of Petitioner No.1, GLAX/OUR DRUIV TS-06_ES_ 2193 of the Petitioner No.2, without following any procedure belonging to the petitioner as being illegal arbit rary and against the principles of natural justrce and violative of Articles '14 16 19 1g 21 30OA and 301 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to release the GLAtr/oUR DRUtv Ap-22-AL2181 of Petitioner No.1, GLAtvoUR DRUtv rs-06-ES-2193 of the petitioner No.2. forthwith

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of FIR No.73/2020, dated 0510712020 on the file of P.S.IVARIKAL, IVAHABUBNAGAR District.

¶16

f.A. NO: 2OF 2020

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances the High Court may be^pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to^{release the petitioner} vecicle i.e GLAIVOUR DRUM AP-22-AL-2181^{of PetitionerNo l, GLAMOURDRUM} TS-06-ES-2193 of the Petitioner^{No.2, forlhwith for the interim custody to the} petitioners

¶18

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusingthe ltilemorandum of} Grounds of criminal Petition^{and upon hearingthe arguments of Sri G.RAJESHWAR} RAO, Advocate for the^{Petitioners and of the Additional PublicProsecutoron behalf} of the Respondents.

¶19

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶20

THE HON,BLE^{SRI JUSTICET'VINOD KUMAR} I P IT 6 f

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This criminal^{petition is filed under Section482 Cr'P C' to quashthe} procer:dings in^{FIR N0.73of 2020dateci 05 07 2020 on tht: file of} P.S.tyarikal,^{lYahabuDnaqaar,registeredfor the offences under section9} of the^{TelanganaGaming Acl, 1g74, as amendedfromtime lo tlme'and} to release lhe^{petitioners'seized two wheelcr vchicles'}

¶23

lhc crimrnal^{petilionis laken up for hearingtoday, ie 09 i2 2020'} t nrrrugh v tdeo confc'cncing.

¶24

3.HeardlearnedcounselforthepetitionersandlearnedAdditional Pr,rblic Prosecutor appearing^{for the 1st respondent} -^State'

¶25

Learned counsel for the^{petitioners would subrnit that though the} present quash petition is filed seeking^quashing of^{the FIR registered} against the^petitioners, they are^{restrictingthetrprayer to the limited} cxtent of this Court directinq the respondent authorities to^releasethe petitionei--q'^two h,heeler vehicles rarhich have been seized in ccnnection with the above crime registered.

¶26

l-carned Additional Public Prosccutor horryever would suL,firil that ;rrtriilty lTre st-.ized vr:hicies i,vere Ci:pos teti undcr thc se zure reporl: in Fornr 60, before the Judicial First^(-i.rss I{ag,strcrtc, Narayanpet, and as tlrc PO was on leave. However, the sanre have been returncd to lhc I resp(inucnt for- deposiiirrq before the. jurisdictional Judicial Firsl C ass Magistrate. Upon such ret,-rrn, the serzcd property has bcen ceposited before the lFctvl, Kodangal, and the petitioners can apprcach the concerned Magistrate Court and file an application seeking releal;e of the saici vehicle s.

¶27

¶28

¶29

Having reqard to the submission madc as abave, thts Court is .i the vrew that the petitroners can be directed ta approach the Judicrar First C/ass Magistrate, Kodangal, secking rciease of the vehictes by making necessary application. Upon the petrtioners making such application, thc concerned t\4agistrate shall consider the same on its 0wn merits and also having regard to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of STINDER BHAI AMBALAL^{DESAI V/S'STATEOFGUJARATN.} 7. Subject to the above^{observation and direction, the criminal} petition is disposed of.^{PencJing miscellaneouspetitions,if any, shall stand} closed in the^{light of this final order'}

¶30

(2002) 10 s cc 290 Sd/-I.NAGA LAKSH ASSISTANT REGIS R ,TRUE COPY'

¶31

SECTIO OFFICER

¶32

To'" 1. Th" Judicial Magistrate of First Class' Kodangal' 2. The Station^{Hou,e oiitl" r"r"ii'] p"ritlstaiion'Naravanpet (lVlahaboobnasao} 3. District.Two^{CCs to Public Prosecutor'High Court for the State of Telangana'Hyderabad} rOUT) a. b"#'ic^{to Sri G Rajeshwar RaoAdvocate (OPUC)}

¶33

Two^{CD CoPies} Kj. \ {.Ao

¶34

l2o0:ll^{LO q( C 2rro}

¶35

HIGH COURT

¶36

DATED:09/12l2020

¶37

o e 1HE s::4 7 4' .1
,'t
I
iq 21DEc2r20
/
/

¶38

ORDER

¶39

CRLP.No.5361 of 2020

¶40

DISPOSING OF THE CRL.P,

¶41

Mohammed Aleem Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Aleem Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mir Johan Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Atul Kataria Vs The State of Telangana

Budidha Karthik Vs The State of Telangana

Kumari Rajani Vs The State of Telangana

M.Jayanath Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Bhavin Kirtikumar Mehta Vs The State of Telangana