High Court allowed bail in a cheating and fraud case. The petitioner argued the victim came willingly. The High Court did not delve into merits but granted bail with a personal bond and sureties.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[31s8 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
tufsoRv, THE TWENTy FIRST DAy oF JANUARy TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI. CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 32O OF 2O2O -
Between:
Gampalla Srinivas, S/o. Lachaiah,
Petitioner/Sole Accused
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of ludicature at Hyderabad
Respondent
Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail pending enquiry and trial in Crime No. 177 of 2019 of Dandepalli P.S., Mancherial District in the interest of justice.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI K V SUBBA REDDY Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, the Court made the following.
ORDER:
.THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI eRIMINALPETITIONNo.320 of 2020
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C., is filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.177 o1' 2019 on the file of Dandepallioolice Station, Mancherial District, registered for the offencepunishable under Sections 366, 417 and 420 IPC.
I
B-i---
a
2
to furnish sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of the Court and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court in the event of his enlargement on bail. Hence, the learned counsel prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the aforesaid case.
sD/-cH. VEN KATESHWAR lsT R ASSISTANTR / trRUEcoPY I I SECTI OFFICER
\ /
To,1. Th" JudicialFirst class Magistrate at Luxe_ttipet,MancherialDistrict' 2. Thesuperint""ii't'o-jiiit*"ttiput'Ma-ncherialDistrlct' -1. ?ffi iiB;ri'[l -tsPl*'"'-:1f; fl"s:iE 5?'nY!]'"o' o' ou'' 5. OneSPareCoPY
HIGH COURT
GSDJ
DATED:21l OL/r'.O2O
ORDER
CRLP.No.320 ofll02O
BAIL
.<br>\oNa<br>ff (\f
llr
\r.. ? r"iin w0 C
\ *
.u{ .t Tctl o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to enlarge the accused on bail in a cheating case where he alleges the incident happened with consent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gampalla Srinivas
The State of Telangana
G Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
