The High Court disposed of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act in accordance with the settlement award passed by the Lok Adalat on 14.12.2019, resolving the dispute between the worker and the employer/insurer.
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award dated 14.12.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE ]USTICE G SRI DEVI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PPEAL NO: 260 OF 2014
Appeal filed Under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act against order dated 0410412013 in W.C.No.l73 of 2003 NF on the file of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation-cu m-Deputy Commissioner of Labour at Nizamabad.
Between:
BOTTURI RAVI, S/o Sayanna, Occ: Cleaner of Jeep bearing No. AP 25 T1021, R/o Nizampur Village, Navipet Mandal, Nizamabad District.
...APPELLANT/APPLICANT
AND
,,.RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRL AZAR SRAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.260 of 2014
JUDCMENl'
Pursuant to a settlement arrived at between the parties, the Lok Adalat, Hyderabad, passed the following award on 74.12.2019:
5 The parties are informed that rhe Court fee, if any, paid by any of them shall be refunded.
2
In view of the award dated 14.12.2019, passed bv the Lok Adalat, Hyderabad, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal 1S disposed of in terms of the award.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
\
To,
sD/- K. SATLESHT ASSISTANT REG RAR //TRUECOPY I I SECT N OFFICER
HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:04/ 11/2020
ORDER CMA.No.260 oJ 2OL4
1 2 t'tov 2020
*.{''
O-co -, -^.-riO
DISPOSING OF THE CMA IN THE TERMS OF LOK ADALAT
N4
I
I I
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
(orsan ized by H ie h ."r., .gt"l?1'",:Jr'5:*H,
Against order ( Bero in re, w 'c ".,0 No'r73i2ooi * ?llfn T3, u ", i ?i, *?,1,.'",il n ro ".u ou o, "nin"i,r" "itn"Deputy commissioner of Labour at Nizamabad)
Appell ant/petitioner Batt uri Ravi s/o Batturi Sailu,, aged 35 years/ occu; Cleaner of Jeep R/o Nizampur village of Nav ipet mandal, Dist. Nizamabad Respondent No.1 rr. National I nsurance company Ltd., represented by its Branch Manager, Branch Office: Nizamabad I Respondent No b1 Syed Javeed s/o Syed Jainuddin, aged major, occu: owner of the Jeep No.Ap25-T-1021 R/o H.No.6 -7-tBB/t2, Chilkalaguda, Hyderab ad
NO. OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE: ORDER ROC. NO.1s1/HCLSC/2019 DT,11_12_2019
Present:
Name of Chairman
Name of [i4embers 1) Sri Pathipaka
)/.
2) Smt.R.Madhavi Latha,
rirCl{ COUP'-i
;\ , { jri lD;',-}' I
)
/.,v
",- --- AWAIID
-=_. )./
Hon'ble Sri Justice p.Naveen Rao, Judge, High court for the State of Telangana
The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the LOK ADALAT and the parties having compromised the case/matter, the following award is passed in terms of settlement.
1, The appellant herein and Sri Azar Sravan Kumar and Sri Azar Kishan Rao, advocates for the appellant and the respondent No.1 thro*ugh Ms.sujatha K.Kumar, Manager, Natlonal Insurance Company Ltd., and iheir counsel are present. The matter has been settled amicably between the pa rties.
(
-1-
I 'it Appellant
tt sr;r6{ 6. tu For National I e Co. Ltd Aut signato, , Respondent No.N
eWart
Counsel for a pps|1..,
e
Chairman mb er '
Counsel for Respondent No,0_
t{@.. Membeir
Date: 14-12-2019
a t:
a
grr-,H': )
.1 t-oKA'"l
S f the co ee
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal should be disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat settlement award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Botturi Ravi
Syed Javid
National Insurance Company Limited
G Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
