The Hon'ble Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging violation of an interim order. Upon submissions that the order was implemented, the court closed the case and noted liberty to challenge proceedings.
Contempt case closed; no further orders; liberty to challenge underlying proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 1168 of 2018
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful violation of the order dated 31.07.2017 passed by this Court in WP.No.25305 /2017.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri J.Srinivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents submits that the order in the writ petition has been implemented and that no further
orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case.
Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel on either side, the Contempt Case is closed. If, still, petitioner is aggrieved by any of the proceedings issued by the respondents in pursuance to the orders in the writ petition, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said proceedings, in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous
applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
08.01.2020 tk
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1168 of 2018
Dt.08.01.2020
tk
Petitioner
Respondents
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
