Allowed

K. Janardhan Reddy v. M/s Elevations Nirman Private Limited and 2 others

Telangana HC2 Jan 2020ARBAPPL/76/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows an arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an arbitrator after a notice was issued despite being returned unclaimed. The court appointed a justice to represent the respondents and directed fee sharing.

What did the court decide?

Arbitrator Sri M.Rajender appointed for respondents; fees to be shared equally.

K. Janardhan Reddy Vs M/s Elevations Nirman Private Limited… — Arbitration | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶2

ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.76 of 2019

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

This Arbitration Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity “the Act”) is filed by the applicant seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for resolution of the disputes between the parties arising out of the Development Agreement-cum-GPA dated 04-06-2007.

¶5

The case of the applicant is that the applicant and respondents 1 to 3 entered into a Development AgreementCum-General Power of Attorney dated 04-06-2007 in respect of property owned by the applicant to an extent of Ac.0-31 guntas in Sy.No.221, Bachupally Village and Grampanchayat, Qutbullapur Mandal, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. Thereafter disputes arose between the parties, since respondents failed to execute the said development agreement. As such, the applicant issued notice dated 03-062019 invoking Clause No.27 of Development Agreement-cumGPA dated 04-06-2007 nominating the Arbitrator. But the respondent avoided to receive the notice and got managed the things and returned the notices. Hence, the present Arbitration Application is filed.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶7

¶8

Though notices issued to the respondents 2 and 3 on the addresses given by them in the Development Agreement-cumGPA, the same were returned as unclaimed and no such person in the address respectively, which amounts to service of notice.

¶9

Clause No.27 of the Development Agreement-cum-GPA dt.04-06-2007 provides for Arbitration, in case of any disputes between the parties, which reads as follows:

¶10

“22. In case of any disputes arises between the parties hereto touching these presents, the matter shall be referred to the Arbitrators; one chosen by each party and in case of any difference of opinion between such Arbitrators, they shall nominate a common umpire and their award shall be final and binding on both the parties and the relevant provisions of the Arbitration Act shall apply.”

¶11

In pursuance of the above said Arbitration Clause, the applicant has already issued a legal notice 03-06-2019 appointing Sri S.M.Rafi, Retired District Judge as Arbitrator, however, there is no response from the respondent. Therefore, the present application deserves to be allowed.

¶12

Accordingly, this Arbitration Application is allowed appointing Sri M.Rajender, Retired District Judge as Arbitrator on behalf of respondents for resolution of dispute(s) arising out of the Development Agreement-cum-GPA dated 04-06-2007 in accordance with the provisions and mandate of the Act of 1996. The learned Arbitrators shall be entitled to

¶13

¶14

fees as per the rates specified in the Fourth Schedule to the Act of 1996, inserted by Act 3 of 2016 with effect from 23-102015, which shall be borne by both parties in equal measure. No order as to costs.

¶15

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶16

____________________________
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
02-01-2020
Note:
Office to mark a copy to
Sri M.Rajender,
Retired District Judge,
Flat No.305, Street No.8,
Soundarya Residency,
Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad.
B/o.
Nvl

¶17

¶18

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶19

ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.34 of 2018

¶20

31.12.2019 (Msr)

K. Janardhan Reddy v. M/s Elevations Nirman Private Limited and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Janardhan Reddy v. M/s Elevations Nirman Private Limited and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Schindler India Private Limited, Vs M/s. Pochiraju Industries Limited

Sachin Chopra Vs S. Padma Reddy

Kisna Avenues Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr. Bhagwan Das Saboo and 6 Others

Mr. Ankit Bhutoria Vs M/s. Global Technologies

Mr.Mohammed Ahmed Vs M/s Apr News Media Limited

Kaizen Power Limited Vs Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited