Uday Kumar Goud. v. Vs The Directorate General of Health Services
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought admission in Post Graduate Medical Courses via an interim order. The court closed the writ petition as the interim direction for a representation was implemented and the admission window closed.
What did the court decide?
Direction for a representation allowed in interim; writ petition subsequently closed.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN
& THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE P. KESHAVA RAO
W RI T PETI TI ON No.8 3 4 8 of 2 0 1 9
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondents to receive his application for first phase of Online counselling for admission into Post Graduate Medical and Dental Course for the academic year 2019-20.
- On 18.04.2019, when the writ petition came up for orders as to admission, this Court passed the following interim order.
“Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the University.
Since the petitioner has not even made an application, it is not possible for us to make any interim order for the forthcoming first phase of counsel scheduled to commence on 21.04.2019. However, the petitioner is permitted to approach the University on 22.04.2019 and submit a representation at least for permitting him to apply for admission in the second phase of counselling.”
- The interim order was given effect to. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication any more in this writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
The University
Coram
V. Ramasubramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/8348/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court