Dismissed
Sri Mamidi Rajasekhar Reddy v. State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/6789/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 6789 of 2019
O R D E R:
When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 that the issue raised in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order, dated 15.03.2017, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.9035 of 2017.
Relevant portion of the aforesaid order reads as under:
“Following the above orders, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to satisfying requirement of Section 428 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and also giving an undertaking that the petitioner would not claim equities or costs of the building construction, in the event LGC has been decided against him, without reference to the letter, dated 31.10.2013, of the Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Hyderabad”.
Following the aforesaid order and for the reasons stated
therein, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms thereof.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition
shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Dt:01.04.2019
kdl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the issue raised in the Writ Petition is covered by the earlier order in W.P. No.9035 of 2017.
Whether to dispose of this Writ Petition by relying on the earlier order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.9035 of 2017, order dated 15.03.2017Followed¶3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
GHMC
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court