Disposed

Dr. Rokkam Sunny Joe v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Jul 2019WP/6507/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Common order closing writ petition batches filed by Telangana MBBS graduates claiming reservation-based PG admission. The Court noted an interim order verified petitioners' reservation status and found the admissions point taken, rendering the cause no longer subsisting on merits. Petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions and pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.

Dr. Rokkam Sunny Joe Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.AMARNATH GOUD

¶2

WRI T PETI TI ON NOS.6505, 6506, 6507 and 6603 of 2019

¶3

COMMON ORDER : (per SK,J)

¶4

The petitioners in this batch of cases completed M.B.B.S. Course in the colleges situated in the present State of Telangana. All of them hail from the State of Andhra Pradesh and belong to reservation categories. The cause for their approaching this Court was that they were not being considered for admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses in the State of Telangana under reservation quota as their community certificates were yet to be accepted.

¶5

By common interim order dated 28.03.2019 passed in these writ petitions, this Court took note of the fact that the castes to which all the petitioners belong were included in the fresh list of reservation categories issued by the State of Telangana after bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh and directed the Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal, to verify whether the castes to which the petitioners belong were included in the Government Orders issued after bifurcation and also the genuineness of the community certificates. In the event they were found to be genuine and the castes were included in the new list, this Court directed that the petitioners should be given the benefit of reservation.

¶6

Ms.K.Pallavi, learned counsel for the petitioners, would inform this Court that pursuant to the aforestated interim order, the cases of all the petitioners were duly considered and they were given admission in Post Graduate Medical Courses under reservation categories.

¶7

¶8

Mr.G.Ravi, learned counsel representing Mr.A.Prabhakar Rao, learned standing counsel for the University, would also concede that the cause in these writ petitions no longer survives for consideration on merits.

¶9

In the light of the aforestated facts, the writ petitions are closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶10

______________
SANJAY KUMAR,J

¶11

_________________
T.AMARNATH GOUD,J
Date:17.07.2019
GJ

Dr. Rokkam Sunny Joe v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Rokkam Sunny Joe v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Sree Srinivasa Constructions Vs The Hdb Financial Services

M/s.Via Rd 2 Vs Andhra Bank

Tadakamalla Rajendra Kumar Vs The General Manager

Dr. Shavala Prem Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Dr. Varada Sai Sree Harsha, Vs The State of Telangana

Dr. Naveen Kumar Lanka Vs The State of Telangana