This writ petition challenged the respondents' inaction in mutating petitioners' names in revenue records, alleging arbitrariness.
Directed the 2nd Respondent-Tahsildar to conduct an enquiry into the petitioners' mutation application and dispose of it within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Dr . JUSTI CE SHAMEEM AKTHER
W RI T PETI TI ON No.5 4 8 9 OF 2 0 1 9
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not mutating the names of petitioners in the revenue records in respect of land to an extent of Ac.3.20 guntas in Survey Nos.53 (A) and Ac.0.01 guntas in Survey No.54 (AA), vide Kaatha No.223 of Padamati Somavaram Village, Bibinagar Mandal,
Yadadri District, as arbitrary and illegal.
2
Survey No.53A of Padamati Somavaram Village, Bibinagar Mandal.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
Dr . SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
APRI L 2 3 , 2 0 1 9 YVL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the implication that a third party is in possession of land justifies non-mutation without a formal enquiry under the relevant Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramulu Goud's Family (via Petitioners)
2nd Respondent-Tahsildar
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
