In this writ petition, the petitioner Association complained that respondents did not act against illegal construction by the 7th respondent on their land. The Court held not to decide the private dispute regarding encroachment, noting the petitioner could approach the civil court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
W.P.No.5249 of 2019
ORDER
This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondents 2 to 6 in not taking action against the illegal construction made by the 7th respondent in the land of the petitioner Association, as illegal and arbitrary.
CKR, J W.P.No.5249 of 2019
2
shall stand closed.
________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
18th March, 2019
sj
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ court can decide a dispute regarding alleged encroachment between private parties.
Whether the respondents have a duty to act on a representation regarding illegal construction.
Whether the petitioner is directed to approach the civil court for the dispute.
Petitioner Association
6th respondent
7th respondent
Respondents 2 to 6
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
