Disposed

P. Narayan Reddy and 5 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC5 Dec 2019WP/26394/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged an order holding them encroachers of land. Having filed an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer which was pending, the Writ Petition was disposed of by directing the appellate authority to decide the appeal expeditiously within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; appeal before Revenue Divisional Officer to be decided within eight weeks; status quo maintained.

P. Narayan Reddy and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others — Telangana HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.26394 OF 2019

¶3

Date:05.12.2019

¶4

Between:

¶5

P. Narayana Reddy, S/o. Ramanuja Reddy, Age 70 years, Occ: Retd. Govt. Servant, R/o.H.no.126 LIGH, New Santhosh Nagar Colony, Hyderabad and others

¶6

.. Petitioners

¶7

And

¶8

The State of Telangana, rep., through its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶9

The Court made the following:

¶10

¶11

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶12

WRIT PETITION No.26394 OF 2019

¶13

ORDER :

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

¶16

Aggrieved by the order of the Tahsildar, Quthubullapur Mandal, Medchal – Malkajgiri District, the 4^th respondent, dated 28.02.2019, under the Land Encroachment Act, 1905, holding that the petitioners as encroachers of land to an extent of Ac.0.35 guntas in Survey No.251 of Quthbullapur Village and Mandal, Medchal – Malkajgiri District, petitioners filed appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Malkajgiri Division, Medchal – Malkajgiri District, the 3^rd respondent. Along with the said appeal, petitioners claimed

¶17

to have filed application for grant of stay. Alleging that neither in the appeal nor in stay petition, orders are passed, this Writ Petition is filed.

¶18

Since appeal was already filed and pending before

¶19

the 3^rd respondent, without expressing any opinion on merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 3^rd respondent to dispose of the appeal, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording due opportunity to the petitioners and by assigning due reasons in support of the said decision. Pending disposal of the appeal, status quo obtaining as on day shall be maintained by the parties. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶20

P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:05.12.2019

¶21

Note:- Issue C.C. in three days. (B/o) KH

P. Narayan Reddy and 5 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Narayan Reddy and 5 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Parvez and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

P. Vijay Singh Vs The Sub Registrar Officer

(Smt.) Kanagala Parvathi Vs State of Telangana And 2 Others

Dev Singh Jadhav Vs The State of Telangana

Erukulla Rajender Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Women Development Welfare Association Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others