Allowed

M/s Scasa v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Oct 2019WP/22681/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a writ petition filed by a car purchaser against the State of Telangana. Directing the respondents to register the vehicle based on the invoice price, the court refused to allow demand of additional life tax on the ex-showroom price. Petitioner ordered to submit documents required for registration of vehicles purchased outside the state.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to register the vehicle for the invoice price without demanding additional life tax on the ex-showroom price.

M/s Scasa Vs State of Telangana — Consumer Protection | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.22681 OF 2019

¶3

DATED :18.10.2019

¶4

Between :

¶5

M/s.SCASA, rep., by its Proprietor, Ms.Nisha Manghnani D/o.Preetamdas Bhagwandas, Aged about 44 yrs, R/o.8-2-674/B/3/4B, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

And
State of Telangana,
Rep., by its Principal Secretary,
Transport Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.
.. Respondents

¶8

This court made the following :

¶9

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.22681 OF 2019

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Transport.

¶14

Petitioner claims to have purchased Land Rover Range Rover Sport 3.0L DSL SE Motor car from M/s.Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, for an invoice of Rs.1,07,06,000/- vide invoice No.VI920CMA1-00086 dated 28.09.2019 and obtained temporary registration number as GJ/1/TMP/2019/180255. The temporary certificate of registration dated 28.09.2019 indicates that vehicle shall be permanently registered at RTAHyderabad-CZ, Telangana. Petitioner alleges that when she approached the respondents to register her vehicle permanently, she was asked to pay excess amount towards life tax based on ex Showroom price of the vehicle. According to petitioner life tax is payable on the invoice but not on the ex Showroom price and therefore petitioner is not required to pay the additional tax demanded.

¶15

In support of the claim that petitioner is not required to pay additional amount demanded by the respondents, she placed reliance on the decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018 which was upheld by the Division Bench in W.A.No.805 of 2018.

¶16

Learned Single Judge of this Court held that the State cannot be allowed to levy life tax on the ex-showroom price shown in the price list, when it is not the actual cost of the vehicle and the life tax has to be levied on the actual cost of the

¶17

¶18

vehicle as paid by the purchaser of the vehicle which can be reflected from the invoice. This view of learned Single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench of this Court.

¶19

Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the fact that the issue is covered by the decision referred to above.

¶20

Following the earlier decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018 dated 02.05.2018 this Writ Petition is also allowed. The respondents are directed to register Land Rover Range Rover Sport 3.0L DSL SE Motor car purchased from M/s.Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, for the price of Rs.1,07,06,000/- vide invoice No. VI920CMA1-00086 dated 28.09.2019 with temporary registration number GJ/1/TMP/2019/180255, without demanding additional life tax on ex-show room price, subject to payment of life tax based on the invoice price of the vehicle as per invoice dated 28.09.2019 and if the vehicle is fulfilling all other parameters for registration as per the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. Further as vehicle was purchased outside the State and registration is sought in Telangana State, petitioner shall also submit all the documents required for registration of vehicle purchased out side the state of Telangana. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶21

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶22

18^th October, 2019

¶23

Rds

M/s Scasa v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Scasa v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.G. Gyaneshwar Vs The State of Telangana and 7 others

N. Venkateswara Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Smt Kathula Radhabai Vs The State of Telangana

Maneti Vasanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Moinuddin Ahmed Burney, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by the Principal Secretary

Mrs Rajeshwari Raman Vs Mr Jayaram Gunturu